..........................................................................................................
anon...........................
anon they're still on a spectrum......... that's what the gradient represents
>gradient
it looks like two gradients existing in a binary. white and dark purple are very different; black and white are the poster childs of contrast; yellow and purple are complementary. the gradient idea isnt bad they should just do it right.
it would make more sense to have green; yellow; orange if you must have stripes. the problem there is that you still have a clear binary on the flag, just not so argechus. the other problem is how god damn ugly that is. if you did a american style flag with those colors it would be even less of a binary. though that would still be ugly as sin.
anon you have uber autism flag colors have meanings, and they just sometimes put it together in an order that looks nice (so grouping darker and lighter colors) >Each color stripe represents a different part of the non-binary group and symbolizes those whose gender falls outside of and without reference to the binary (yellow), people with many or all genders (white), those whose gender identity falls somewhere between male/female or is a mix of them (purple), and people who feel they are without a gender (black).
i said white and black above because i was going to steelman but youve brought it up so... >black
deep purple. >white
light yellow. >flag colors have meanings
so does the shape and arraignments; or it does in a good design. non-binary is more of an ideology, or maybe pathology, than it is a proper term for how a person feels and or is. the only people who can pull off representing people in their flag is ethnostate advocates and racial supremacists. the original pride flag is a rainbow because the original pride movement called for inclusion, tolerance, and equality: the flag has many colors side by side. a white flag might have made more ideal, but white is also a color of peace, purity, and surrender and that is the dead opposite of what they where pushing for. being gay to anyone out side of this shit is just one thing, most people see all the letters as representing different flavors of gay. its all queer in the eyes of normalhomosexuals. a large part of why they see it like that, or did perhaps, is because of the original flag. i under stand that the alliance was political, but i dont believe the masses do. having a flag for each denomination undermines that, and maybe that is the point. but having a flag that is meant to represent a large diverse group of people should not try and include a color for ever one. it will always be inaccurate and adds unnecessary and artificial baggage, which, i assume, reducing that was the point of having many flags. you keep dividing people up like this youre going to end up with everyone writing their names on it. if you really wanted to represent all the people, the best idea would be using the back ground color in my image because that is a mix of all the colors in on the flag. but as i said i see that as a bad idea.
the flag needs to represent what the people rally under. the flag is the unity of the people given form: why the hell is it contradicting its own ideology.
AFAb enbies have poor color vision causing their art choices to read as unusual.
It makes sense if you view them as men as men have poor color vision. 10% red-green color blind.
That said I’ve never met a color blind mtf.
shit youre right.
i just checked and that light yellow is really blue; i forgot i had the red cranked up on my laptop.
still, 10% wont make that look right. even if someone is full red-green color blind it still would have the light dark contrast, symmetrical design, even number of stripes, and at the very least yellow-blue contrast. which while i admit isnt as bad as purple-yellow it still isnt good and makes no sense when you consider the point of purple is that its meant to be a a mix of red and blue (representing a mix of man and women). also there a many male artists with amazing eyes. its still has the fundamental problem of trying to represent people and not what the people represent. theve built a pyramid upside down.
what are we even looking at
the nonbinary flag being binary
I don't see any binary, can you add red circles and arrows or something?
??????
the dark colors are on the left while the light ones are on the right
..........................................................................................................
anon...........................
anon they're still on a spectrum......... that's what the gradient represents
>gradient
it looks like two gradients existing in a binary. white and dark purple are very different; black and white are the poster childs of contrast; yellow and purple are complementary. the gradient idea isnt bad they should just do it right.
it would make more sense to have green; yellow; orange if you must have stripes. the problem there is that you still have a clear binary on the flag, just not so argechus. the other problem is how god damn ugly that is. if you did a american style flag with those colors it would be even less of a binary. though that would still be ugly as sin.
anon you have uber autism flag colors have meanings, and they just sometimes put it together in an order that looks nice (so grouping darker and lighter colors)
>Each color stripe represents a different part of the non-binary group and symbolizes those whose gender falls outside of and without reference to the binary (yellow), people with many or all genders (white), those whose gender identity falls somewhere between male/female or is a mix of them (purple), and people who feel they are without a gender (black).
i said white and black above because i was going to steelman but youve brought it up so...
>black
deep purple.
>white
light yellow.
>flag colors have meanings
so does the shape and arraignments; or it does in a good design. non-binary is more of an ideology, or maybe pathology, than it is a proper term for how a person feels and or is. the only people who can pull off representing people in their flag is ethnostate advocates and racial supremacists. the original pride flag is a rainbow because the original pride movement called for inclusion, tolerance, and equality: the flag has many colors side by side. a white flag might have made more ideal, but white is also a color of peace, purity, and surrender and that is the dead opposite of what they where pushing for. being gay to anyone out side of this shit is just one thing, most people see all the letters as representing different flavors of gay. its all queer in the eyes of normalhomosexuals. a large part of why they see it like that, or did perhaps, is because of the original flag. i under stand that the alliance was political, but i dont believe the masses do. having a flag for each denomination undermines that, and maybe that is the point. but having a flag that is meant to represent a large diverse group of people should not try and include a color for ever one. it will always be inaccurate and adds unnecessary and artificial baggage, which, i assume, reducing that was the point of having many flags. you keep dividing people up like this youre going to end up with everyone writing their names on it. if you really wanted to represent all the people, the best idea would be using the back ground color in my image because that is a mix of all the colors in on the flag. but as i said i see that as a bad idea.
the flag needs to represent what the people rally under. the flag is the unity of the people given form: why the hell is it contradicting its own ideology.
>deep purple
They were nonbinary the whole time?
AFAb enbies have poor color vision causing their art choices to read as unusual.
It makes sense if you view them as men as men have poor color vision. 10% red-green color blind.
That said I’ve never met a color blind mtf.
nice joke, but not nice enough for my to not point out that yellow has neither red not green.
>for my to not point out that yellow has neither red not green.
Exactly. So it looks normal to red-green color blind people.
shit youre right.
i just checked and that light yellow is really blue; i forgot i had the red cranked up on my laptop.
still, 10% wont make that look right. even if someone is full red-green color blind it still would have the light dark contrast, symmetrical design, even number of stripes, and at the very least yellow-blue contrast. which while i admit isnt as bad as purple-yellow it still isnt good and makes no sense when you consider the point of purple is that its meant to be a a mix of red and blue (representing a mix of man and women). also there a many male artists with amazing eyes. its still has the fundamental problem of trying to represent people and not what the people represent. theve built a pyramid upside down.
Fuck I'm colourblind ig I lose again
>never met a colour blind mtf.
hi that's me
I think OP is onto something. mostly drugs
Does this look better or worse than the original
>t. malebrained flag enjoyer
infinitely better.
still not ideal. mine looks worse i think.
Kind of close to Christian symbolism imo, but not bad. I've never seen asymmetry like that but it's a good design choice in this case