Buick Regal 1986

Why is it considered only as good as what scrap metal can get you for? Looks like a cheap reliable car imo

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    if you can buy it for cheap and can wrench on your own car and have a mechanic friend that can point you in the right direction just go for it
    life is too short to drive normalfag cars

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >life is too short to drive normalfag cars
      Based.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >life is too short to drive normalfag cars
      this

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >g-body
    >not criminally expensive for one that clean
    0/10

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      most of those were owned by little old ladies who just used it to get to the pharmacy and church once a week

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I got one of those 20 years ago for $1k. It was immaculate except a dent on the front right fender from pulling in/out of the garage, and it only had like 18k miles on it.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah the 80 year old owner banged it into the garage, her nephew took her keys away, and sold the car. The end.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That was pretty much the gist. My mom worked with the son, his mom got too old to drive and I got a really clean Cutlass coupe.

            >tfw dad sold the mint condition, family owned since new Regal Limited for $2500 in the mid '00s
            >impossible to find any of them in clean condition that isn't a donk/GN clone now
            I'm still mad about it, and I'm not planning on paying $10-20k+ for a "collector" one so I'm complaining about it online instead

            I traded mine for a 5.0LX, the Cutlass was only a V6 though.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >tfw dad sold the mint condition, family owned since new Regal Limited for $2500 in the mid '00s
          >impossible to find any of them in clean condition that isn't a donk/GN clone now
          I'm still mad about it, and I'm not planning on paying $10-20k+ for a "collector" one so I'm complaining about it online instead

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nah, most of them were owned by vatos and gang bangers

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That was after their 80 year old owners got put in a rest home and the car was sold to Jose.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >g body regal
    >cheap reliable car
    where?

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >~40 year old car
    >reliable without significant investment
    pick 1 (one)

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    10-20 years ago, that was true. But I haven't seen one that isnt a basket case shitbox since then. Also I don't look for them. Too slow and poor handling for modern traffic. I had a few of the oldsmobuicks.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >Too slow and poor handling for modern traffic
      it's a 1980s car not a 1930s car

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Ive owned those cars. Much prefer an 00s 5spd shitbox that can pass people and take corners

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          until you need to turn and now you're tilted about 30 degrees to the side.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            meant to quote

            to be honest 60s cars are more drivable than 80s ones. that huge torquey V8 lets you cruise effortlessly down the highway all day long.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Looks like you responded to the wrong post there.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        to be honest 60s cars are more drivable than 80s ones. that huge torquey V8 lets you cruise effortlessly down the highway all day long.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Any american car from the 60s,70s,or 80s car is going to kill you if you hit the Twisties at 90s econobox speeds. Unless its been modified heavily

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            no? it's not a Porsche. you're supposed to drive in a straight line down the freeway.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >A yacht can't navigate narrow, rocky passages quickly
            I mean, duh?

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Why is it considered only as good as what scrap metal can get you for? Looks like a cheap reliable car imo

    learn how to speak fucking english dipshit. You could barely find cars like this 20 years ago so I don't even know what the fuck you are talking about.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    s10fag

    only 307 or 305 were decent stock engines, supermajority are self destructing LD5 3.8 or equally wheezy and obscure 239 v6

    most of them are rollers and set up for a sbc anyways now, decent first project cars for the $1000 range

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the 307 was not a decent stock engine

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      oh yes, some also had the utter shit Olds diesel V8

      • 2 weeks ago
        s10fag

        i have not seen one running that isn't $10,000 "i know what i got" galore despite the V6 being the only desirable diesel

        but i did pass up on a parisienne in dry storage with just 45k miles with a typically fucked up 350, it was an immaculate car for $2500

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The interior build quality in 1980s GM products is horrendous, and you can certainly expect plenty of electrical gremlins and lackluster automatic transmissions. What qualifies as a "reliable car" to you exactly?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *