BTC will never be below 27k ever again Posted on May 20, 2023 by Anonymous Maybe a slight dip to 26950, but never ever below again.
We wont count btc in the future in whole coins anymore
Sat is truth, sat is secure, sat is independent, sat cant be controlled by any centralized predator
BTC is the Alpha Predator, now with evem compatibility
no other chains or monetary systems needed
Are maxis actually this delusional?
What is delusional about this?
Its the future; a user base and culture primarily interested in security, instead of fiat maximization like the retards and ~~*devs*~~ on the current evm chains
The only reason BRC shit exists is because of ethereum. How can you tout something like evm compatibility and then just dismiss the chain responsible for it?
I recognize the work done by eth and evm; kind of how I recognize that ltc served at the beginning as a test net for experiments that one couldn't run straight on the btc network; but POS was either a preplanned attempt to gain back control by the powers that were or a poorly conceptualized idea not thought to the end
>Can't be controlled
Tell that to the custodial LN wallet retards that are gaining ground. BTC has problems that need to be solved and all the copium in the world won't help.
There are only 21 Million whole corns
in contrast to pos where it is enough to just crab the price of the pos token while luring suckers in with erc-20 or the equivalent and rug them over and over again
Sure it needs to be addressed, but for the time being not a problem, tail emission issue comes in 150 years
I'm not arguing for pos, my issue is with custodial scaling solutions, and if global adoption is even being considered, that's an immediate issue
To solve that problem, its good enough for software developers and custodians to compete, multiple custodians competing over the layer 2s.
It might be in the end countries offering specific custodial solutions for their citizen, which is still pretty much decentralized; though I agree, its something that needs to be kept in mind
>multiple custodians competing over the layer 2s
My issue would be, what does competition matter in this case if they are complying with a centralized gov/analysis entity? I take the extra steps to remain in self custody because that's the biggest feature and to me its concerning to see the direction backtrack to custodial after years of work towards self sovereignty
Bigger blocks lead to more centralization on the base layer, which is more dangerous than a smaller degree of distribution on second layers; which if they become a danger due to bad actors trying to groom suckers can just be abandoned or attacked; it wont hurt the base layer
>Thinks in fiat
>dumps your bonds
>if they become a danger due to bad actors trying to groom suckers
Just in my observations of the space, its not an if, its a right now issue, especially now in the early stages of mass individual user adoption.
I think I see where you come from; the time when nation states and those over invested in fiat see that their time is running out and their fiat is going to be thrown into the lake of fire, is going to be dangerous - but it will be overcome because enough nations have already an interest to fuck the current hegemonic unit of account the usd, that fucked their nations, cultures and economies for 90 years, and btc is their best bet; those will cooperate and not be an issue in my opinion, might be naive; I tend to be to optimistic about human nature
A perfect bounce, just as foreseen
don't look but Bitcoin is about to go under $26950
Keep smiling mumu. Your bitcoin is going down soon.
Bitcoin is the future and the only relevant currency today, it will never go below 27k again
Sure dude whatever you say. Once that government default news comes in. Boom down goes bitcoin.
Yea sure people would sell, but how does that change the fact that BTC can be used as an alternative mode of exchange? You're obsessed with fiat value and have lost the plot
i warned these niggas that was the last chance they had to buy.