I've seen a similar tweet once but with funnier book titles, it had an entry about bringing Hitler back to life. Meanwhile "sad boy" 4 times is lazy and that trope is normally attributed to Russian literature only.
[...]
[...]
[...]
The seething is proof of accuracy.
>this much SEETHING
Which sad boi book are you reading, nurturing the delusion that if you can relate to it then your life is worth something or maybe that you too could become an author?
[...] >seething even more!
Boy, that really struck a nerve with you, didn't it?
This would be funny if the summaries were either a bit more specific (the funniest entries being dosto and hvalen) or if the imagined person conjured who reads all these sad books were. However, this is a list of generic attributes, collected together. >sad american family >sad boy w/ girl >sad french gay boy
are three summaries which each describe hundreds of "classics", but not in any meaningful sense, and certainly not specific enough to even be more popular among male than female readers. As it stands, I know like three women for whom that list describes their favorite books, and no men who have read anything that fits the above outside of Grapes of Wrath and Search for Lost Time. Both of which are more popular among women anyway.
If you feel attacked by this, you're literally looking for something to be offended by. >Top books that stupid homosexuals like: >- man builds thing >- man and woman meet >- family drama >- edgy philosophy >- looong book
bet you all feel real called out now
I recommend women the clockwork orange they typically tell me I'm crazy while it's still in the ordinary british lad having innocent fun with his bros phase
>ask classmates what they're researching >male classmates are all researching fascinating, unique, or at least ambitious things >woman: "Misogyny in Rome" >woman: "Misogyny and Hamlet" >woman: "The intersection of misogyny and periods in Hamlet" >woman: "Women" >woman: "Opinions about women having sex in Weimar newspapers" >woman: "Women in the work of Robert Musil" >woman: "Vagina" >woman: "I have a vagina" >woman: "I'm a woman btw. Vagina here" >woman: "Sex and periods in gender" >woman: "Woman perceptions of woman, ,vagina, cooters breasts woman period I'm on my period clitorises in the work of the band Oingo Boingo and Hamlet's Perception of Clitoris Vagina Gender Studies" >woman: "Queering Gender in Medieval Manuscripts: Your period or MY period?" >woman: "Misogyny, Periods, and You: Ernst Cassirer on Substance, Function, and My Gay Love Affair with Gender Studies" >woman: "Women in 'Woman's Work': Gendering Gender in the Social Sciences" >woman: "Prostitution and Gender in Antebellum Calcutta" >woman: "Gender" >woman: "Sex and gender studies" >woman: "Tampons, pads, and ironclads: Stonewall Jackson and Freebleeding" >woman: "Einstein contra Bergson: Who rapes me more by having existed?"
This is flawless. I teach. It's shockingly true. This semester I got one titled "Gender and The Female in Joseph Conrad: Gendering Conrad's Women" from a graduating senior. Within 4 years they're all spouting the exact same ideological swill. None of my suggested paper topics touch on this at all and I only teach totally formalism/semiotics so it's fascinating reading 15 of the same paper proposals for every class.
>makes wild assumption about group >target group raises objections >lol seething, this means it's true
I have an assumption that you enjoy eating your own excreta
>this much SEETHING
Which sad boi book are you reading, nurturing the delusion that if you can relate to it then your life is worth something or maybe that you too could become an author?
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
ok coprophage
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>if I keep repeating this 4th grade insult, I will look cool!
No wonder your writing isn't going anywhere.
Generally speaking it’s a bit of a red flag. Very few creepy guys are happy. Most are sad and keep to themselves. So it’s slightly weird when a guy it super interested in reading or identify with those types
This would be funny if the summaries were either a bit more specific (the funniest entries being dosto and hvalen) or if the imagined person conjured who reads all these sad books were. However, this is a list of generic attributes, collected together. >sad american family >sad boy w/ girl >sad french gay boy
are three summaries which each describe hundreds of "classics", but not in any meaningful sense, and certainly not specific enough to even be more popular among male than female readers. As it stands, I know like three women for whom that list describes their favorite books, and no men who have read anything that fits the above outside of Grapes of Wrath and Search for Lost Time. Both of which are more popular among women anyway.
If you feel attacked by this, you're literally looking for something to be offended by. >Top books that stupid homosexuals like: >- man builds thing >- man and woman meet >- family drama >- edgy philosophy >- looong book
bet you all feel real called out now
The bait is dumb but i appreciate that OP managed to get people to take the bait repeatedly.
You can't win an argument with somone who is just looking to make u mad anons, stop replying, its not that deep.
HELLOOOOO BABY DJIRL
BABY DJIRL U SO PRETTY
i kiss u baby djirl, mUUuaAAhhhH hehehe
i kiss baby djirl on forehead
i kiss baby djirl on lips
i kiss baby djirl on PUSSY LIPS muuuAAARRHHH
:*
open vagene and bobs now bitch baby djirl
I actually do kinda wish as a culture we could just uniformly decide to react to snarkposts like hers with the relentless sexual harrasment of the entire indian subcontinent, in exactly that tone, which is simultaneously ridiculous and menacing, and becomes that much more degrading to snarkposters because it is both at the same time.
Only literal naggers like OP and his ilk are personally threatened by Twitter screenshots made by women who are no better than the chudnagger jack-off juice that is spilt to their visage. Read what you want to read, and do it organically. Fucking retard.
Books I actually made my girlfriend read >Frustrated Romanian boy fixes his country >Frustrated Austrian boy fixes his country >Frustrated Spanish boy fixes his country >Frustrated Italian boy fixes his country >Artistic reconstructions/cross-sections of medieval castles
>45-year-old self-described feminist who never had kids uses daddy's money to travel to worldly destinations based on her astrological sign to find herself
I don't specifically care what women think about literature. Mostly they prefer generic romances and memoirs, because in a woman's mind doing anything too challenging or out of the ordinary has to be justified, with the presumption that you should conform to what everyone else is doing and not rock the boat.
Why is most literature so depressing? Is there some notiin that happy stories are not deep enough? Literature misrepresents life, life isn't always depressing.
And yet I got instabanned for saying I hate trannies on /x/
entire boards filled with spam nonstop, but my one comment on a dead thread gets me instabanned
fucking nagger trannies on this site, I hope you meet a horrible end
books women read >millionaire wants to have sex with me >19 year old quirkus girl warrior is admired by everyone >underrepresented historic contributions of black women that will show how much I care about minorities >daily life of rich 19th century girls aka cute (rich) aristocrat boy falls in love with me >stephen king
These books are: >As I Lay Dying >Not sure, honestly, maybe e-boita or Wuthering Heights >Probably The Count of Monte Cristo >Crime and Punishment >Annotated Moby-Dick by LULZ
This is really weird. I don't know any women who read anything remotely good. It is either Sarah Maas, something marketed to look exactly like sarah maas, a thriller about a maverick police detective inevitably named Jack, or Harry Potter. Women I know seem to realise this and are aware that their taste in books is kind of shit. My sister is first violin in an orchestra and she exclusively listens to classial music. I'm not going to suggest she listen to my Stereophonics albums because I know my taste in music is inferior to hers. I always figured it was much the same with literature.
I've seen a similar tweet once but with funnier book titles, it had an entry about bringing Hitler back to life. Meanwhile "sad boy" 4 times is lazy and that trope is normally attributed to Russian literature only.
>Russian literature only
Every french book I've read was about a sad boy/man.
Try Stendhal, Balzac, Dumas, Moliere, Rabelais, Hugo, Voltaire, Zola, Baudelaire, Maupassant, Gide, Artaud, Diderot or Perec.
In fact, try anyhing but Houellebecq, Proust and Camus.
>Balzac
>Like ballsack
Ballsack is full of sad bois.
And all other kinds of boys as well.
But also full of sad girls, sad old men, sad old women, happy rich men, inheritance etc.
>so many virgins SEETHING
Good post.
meds
>seething even more!
Boy, that really struck a nerve with you, didn't it?
I think it was Hitler's Secret Hitler, Lonely Russian Soldier Boy and something about ww2 battleships
蔶崺瑝罧譼诞忳廞缶烖儔笽灒籝庢洧掟嵨媪坳睶伧唒氂脬? 箯猵翄皟壆浸, 葌疔樺爙訴鑀柽旮錮.
>钸鬫禡葵鵆頧觰
>猷荇狍偖齻愂, 潎锠瀃
>櫑繸颭锈濏朜己骴蠼
>郑近鞋归墖恱瀵锞仝
>廨狌 发渠蝜吳 ツツツ!!
Go back you retarded redditor
>Sad American family
>Sad boy w/ girl
What are these two?
My pick for Sad American Family would be The Corrections by Jonathan Franzen
How about grapes of wrath?
As I lay Dying, Wuthering Heights
East of eden
Dame aux Camellias
The Sound and the Fury
The Sound and the Fury
Stoner
Outer Dark
the great gatsby
East of Eden
Spring Snow
Sad American Family is most of Eugene O'Neill
The Sound and the Fury
The Sorrows of Young Werther
What is sad boy w/ girl that could be so many books
That's the point, lots of books liked by men are like that...
>chudface dissing her fellow chuds
the only obvious one is the last, 4 could be literally anything by dostoyevsky
I see the word gay I upvote
I recommend women the clockwork orange they typically tell me I'm crazy while it's still in the ordinary british lad having innocent fun with his bros phase
Uhm excuse me? I like to read about normal happy healthy people with successful careers and stable families
more like
>Sad japanese gay boy
homosexual hands made this post
i think this is more of a pseud list. The "Boyfriend" list should have SF, fantasy, horror, historical fiction and, yes, Boats.
>ask classmates what they're researching
>male classmates are all researching fascinating, unique, or at least ambitious things
>woman: "Misogyny in Rome"
>woman: "Misogyny and Hamlet"
>woman: "The intersection of misogyny and periods in Hamlet"
>woman: "Women"
>woman: "Opinions about women having sex in Weimar newspapers"
>woman: "Women in the work of Robert Musil"
>woman: "Vagina"
>woman: "I have a vagina"
>woman: "I'm a woman btw. Vagina here"
>woman: "Sex and periods in gender"
>woman: "Woman perceptions of woman, ,vagina, cooters breasts woman period I'm on my period clitorises in the work of the band Oingo Boingo and Hamlet's Perception of Clitoris Vagina Gender Studies"
>woman: "Queering Gender in Medieval Manuscripts: Your period or MY period?"
>woman: "Misogyny, Periods, and You: Ernst Cassirer on Substance, Function, and My Gay Love Affair with Gender Studies"
>woman: "Women in 'Woman's Work': Gendering Gender in the Social Sciences"
>woman: "Prostitution and Gender in Antebellum Calcutta"
>woman: "Gender"
>woman: "Sex and gender studies"
>woman: "Tampons, pads, and ironclads: Stonewall Jackson and Freebleeding"
>woman: "Einstein contra Bergson: Who rapes me more by having existed?"
Kek saved
>saved
Lurk 5 more years before posting.
https://archived.moe/lit/thread/9110465/#9112962
>Women in 'Woman's Work': Gendering Gender in the Social Sciences"
lmao
Never gets old
>Tampons, pads, and ironclads: Stonewall Jackson and Freebleeding
man I love oingo boingo
: "Tampons, pads, and ironclads: Stonewall Jackson and Freebleeding"
For me it's this one
This is flawless. I teach. It's shockingly true. This semester I got one titled "Gender and The Female in Joseph Conrad: Gendering Conrad's Women" from a graduating senior. Within 4 years they're all spouting the exact same ideological swill. None of my suggested paper topics touch on this at all and I only teach totally formalism/semiotics so it's fascinating reading 15 of the same paper proposals for every class.
heh
It's funny because it's true
: "Sex and periods in gender"
Now this on the other hand is objectively funny.
Witnessed and saved
Put me in screencap
Like the movie version of this meme, wildly inaccurate.
The seething is proof of accuracy.
>makes wild assumption about group
>target group raises objections
>lol seething, this means it's true
I have an assumption that you enjoy eating your own excreta
>wild assumption
>wild
The term you're looking for is "accurate".
ok coprophile
>this much SEETHING
Which sad boi book are you reading, nurturing the delusion that if you can relate to it then your life is worth something or maybe that you too could become an author?
ok coprophage
>if I keep repeating this 4th grade insult, I will look cool!
No wonder your writing isn't going anywhere.
lol the seething is proof of accuracy.
Of course like any tourist you are unable to discern seethe from being dismissed as retarded
>N-no I'm not s-s-seething!
I can discern a buttblasted little homosexual when I see one.
How many of your books are sad boi books?
>literally "no u"
You've been demoted to 3rd grader.
>seething even more!
Boy, that really struck a nerve with you, didn't it?
>no u
Here’s my top 5, tell me which fit the meme: Bible, Cloud of Unknowing, Interior Castle, An Order Outside of Time, The Last Rainbow.
You’re clearly a newfag. You have not seen true seethe on this board as I have. ITT is only people dismissively chuckling
>no racist scalphunters
Shit list
I like the one where they say guys will learn everything about Rome instead of going to therapy that's based tho
How come wamin don't let boys be sad? Are they invalidating our emotions or not allowing us to have them?
women are incapable of critical thought
Generally speaking it’s a bit of a red flag. Very few creepy guys are happy. Most are sad and keep to themselves. So it’s slightly weird when a guy it super interested in reading or identify with those types
same applies to women. a girl with a resting bitch face is almost always a slut with mental issues
>So it’s slightly weird when a guy it super interested in Whaling.
No it is not.
潗雞蜍櫉綈瀨赑抦軓鰯. 纨慦簶骏吃畱, 婑条悁兺髴衊挮熪岃厊廧濇綈釙蛶飹镰鸚缍酳壩憈. 鷒劥蔯练芳鱠, 篷.
This would be funny if the summaries were either a bit more specific (the funniest entries being dosto and hvalen) or if the imagined person conjured who reads all these sad books were. However, this is a list of generic attributes, collected together.
>sad american family
>sad boy w/ girl
>sad french gay boy
are three summaries which each describe hundreds of "classics", but not in any meaningful sense, and certainly not specific enough to even be more popular among male than female readers. As it stands, I know like three women for whom that list describes their favorite books, and no men who have read anything that fits the above outside of Grapes of Wrath and Search for Lost Time. Both of which are more popular among women anyway.
If you feel attacked by this, you're literally looking for something to be offended by.
>Top books that stupid homosexuals like:
>- man builds thing
>- man and woman meet
>- family drama
>- edgy philosophy
>- looong book
bet you all feel real called out now
The bait is dumb but i appreciate that OP managed to get people to take the bait repeatedly.
You can't win an argument with somone who is just looking to make u mad anons, stop replying, its not that deep.
Yeah, all props to the OP. Good engagement management. Kinda feel bad for all the dumbasses who got dweebsniped though.
Its hard to find books that aren't about sad boys tbh.
I've read barely any happy books
HELLOOOOO BABY DJIRL
BABY DJIRL U SO PRETTY
i kiss u baby djirl, mUUuaAAhhhH hehehe
i kiss baby djirl on forehead
i kiss baby djirl on lips
i kiss baby djirl on PUSSY LIPS muuuAAARRHHH
:*
open vagene and bobs now bitch baby djirl
I actually do kinda wish as a culture we could just uniformly decide to react to snarkposts like hers with the relentless sexual harrasment of the entire indian subcontinent, in exactly that tone, which is simultaneously ridiculous and menacing, and becomes that much more degrading to snarkposters because it is both at the same time.
Only literal naggers like OP and his ilk are personally threatened by Twitter screenshots made by women who are no better than the chudnagger jack-off juice that is spilt to their visage. Read what you want to read, and do it organically. Fucking retard.
Reduction shit is stupid. Leave it to the Twitter trannies to believe in their own bullshit while only putting forth ideas in 140 characters.
Muh every guy’s favorite story is:
Poor boy grapples with responsibility suddenly placed on their shoulders
how about batshit insane middle age weeb that mogs all the peasants with his radiant ambitions and high morals
Boys read exclusively fantasy schlock
She calls them boys which makes it sound gay
Books I actually made my girlfriend read
>Frustrated Romanian boy fixes his country
>Frustrated Austrian boy fixes his country
>Frustrated Spanish boy fixes his country
>Frustrated Italian boy fixes his country
>Artistic reconstructions/cross-sections of medieval castles
What books is she talking about?
>45-year-old self-described feminist who never had kids uses daddy's money to travel to worldly destinations based on her astrological sign to find herself
#SADBOYSUMMER
I don't specifically care what women think about literature. Mostly they prefer generic romances and memoirs, because in a woman's mind doing anything too challenging or out of the ordinary has to be justified, with the presumption that you should conform to what everyone else is doing and not rock the boat.
fuck bitches
gain wisdom
Not being a misogynist of some kind is absolutely impossible.
Why is most literature so depressing? Is there some notiin that happy stories are not deep enough? Literature misrepresents life, life isn't always depressing.
do women seriously major in english lit as undergrads just so they can make witty tweets like this?
And yet I got instabanned for saying I hate trannies on /x/
entire boards filled with spam nonstop, but my one comment on a dead thread gets me instabanned
fucking nagger trannies on this site, I hope you meet a horrible end
Whales was great though
Whales got me ngl
War
Boats
Sad Russian boy part 4
How to summon the spirit of Hitler (PBUH)
I don't remember the other one
Why do women read so many fucking books about girls being abused. It’s genuinely disturbing. Most of the time they’re autobiographies too
You’re aware this is not a real screenshot right? It’s a parody of the LULZ boats meme
Imagine procreating with this woman. I'd rather fuck sheep.
That "woman" is deprived of a brain. People like that don't even deserve to live.
books women read
>millionaire wants to have sex with me
>19 year old quirkus girl warrior is admired by everyone
>underrepresented historic contributions of black women that will show how much I care about minorities
>daily life of rich 19th century girls aka cute (rich) aristocrat boy falls in love with me
>stephen king
>sad russian boy talks about God
Imagine thinking this is bad...
The only stories worth reading are sad and about God. Sorry!
who /whales/ here?
These books are:
>As I Lay Dying
>Not sure, honestly, maybe e-boita or Wuthering Heights
>Probably The Count of Monte Cristo
>Crime and Punishment
>Annotated Moby-Dick by LULZ
This is really weird. I don't know any women who read anything remotely good. It is either Sarah Maas, something marketed to look exactly like sarah maas, a thriller about a maverick police detective inevitably named Jack, or Harry Potter. Women I know seem to realise this and are aware that their taste in books is kind of shit. My sister is first violin in an orchestra and she exclusively listens to classial music. I'm not going to suggest she listen to my Stereophonics albums because I know my taste in music is inferior to hers. I always figured it was much the same with literature.
Yeah this isn't a good edit. The original one is unironically a lot funnier.