Black American IQ levels have been consistently increasing and catching up to the rest of population.
Nurture trumps nature when it comes to IQ and heritability
>Nurture trumps nature
what nurture? what is going on, in your opinion, that would justify this claim?
because the more likely explanation is the fine-tuning of IQ tests by woketard "scientists".
>the more likely explanation is the fine-tuning of IQ tests
Literally not a thing. You cannot fine tune an IQ test to favour something. Many variants of them are context agnostic or damn close to it.
>Many variants of them are claimed to be context agnostic or damn close to it.
fixed it for you. the problem is that old IQ tests become known and have to be replaced, and the replacements can easily be different. IQ has many dimensions - verbal, spatial etc. - and the relative weight of these dimensions can be shifted to achieve apparently woke results, because different human subspecies perform differently on these.
>and the relative weight of these dimensions can be shifted to achieve apparently woke results, because different human subspecies perform differently on these.
I wonder when will these trolls be banned. answer in earnest or hang yourself, retard.
So the test results don't align with your belief so they aren't legit? Not like they are saying blacks are matching whites yet so I'm not sure why you find OP so controversial.
don't just post 'cope'. engage in discussion or get lost. but you knew that this was the problem, so no point in explaining it further.
and yes, science consists in trying to find a falsification. ALWAYS. someone comes at you with an unbelievable claim, you try to find explanations.
The claims of a slowly closing gap isn't even that crazy. Why does it even trigger you so much?
Lol, maybe in the magical land of Narnia, but here in realityland no…
they know how to twist their fingers in the most retarded way, but they don't know how to live a live outside of crime and retardation, truly sad
Take your meds
dude. why are you coping and seething so hard. Your trying to push something that just won’t stand up to any lasting scrutiny
Dumb blacks can’t pass tests
>so we lower the scores and standards
Dumb blacks still can’t pass
>so we implement a bell curve
Dumb idiot blacks STILL can’t pass
>so we create affirmative action and blame whitey
Dumb stupid blacks STILL, against all odds CANT PASS
>so we just start handing them race points along with affirmative action admission to schools
Surprise Surprise, dumb blacks can’t handle college, technical school, or university,
>so we just say fuck it and graduate them with 2.3 GPAs
I’ve never seen a red carpet laid out for joggers like i have here in america and they still manage to screw it all up,
>won’t stand up to any lasting scrutiny
The irony of this coming from some fag whose political views dont stand up to any lasting scrutiny. Hence why he posts here kek
not an argument but cool story bro
>Your trying to push something that just won’t stand up to any lasting scrutiny
then the illiterate reveals he misunderstood completely what I said, and argues against the exact opposite. oh retard, don't you get I said blacks aren't really getting smarter?
>different human subspecies
since 'race' is the wrong word for many reasons, but you cannot claim that e.g. khoisans and japanese are not different subspecies, when much smaller differences are considered enough to separate subspecies in the rest of the animal kingdom.
as an aside, I've encountered a baffling manifestation of stupidity, most likely the result of american education: some people think that in this context the "sub" in "subspecies" means "inferior" as in "subhuman". it doesn't. it means "part", as in "subsystem" or "subdivision". if there are human subspecies, then everyone belongs to one. I've never thought I'll have to clarify this, but I have to adapt to my audience.
What taxonomists consider a "cut-off" for subspecies is completely arbitrary, especially if genetics are taken into account. There are subspecies (and even SPECIES) of birds with less genetic differentiation than that seen between native groups in Europe.
>There are subspecies (and even SPECIES) of birds
>the more likely explanation is the fine-tuning of IQ tests by woketard "scientists".
This is the correct answer.
>Fine tuning a cognitive test
more weight on verbal IQ? israelites win.
more weight on short-term memory, like long problem text and no picture? the less well-read, less literate win.
more weight on spatial intelligence? inuits win.
problem has a seed of confusion by implying left-to-right arrow of time? arabs lose.
and in general you cannot have IQ tests being culture-specific and not tuneable to favor certain cultures.
>IQ tests being culture-specific and not tuneable to favor certain cultures.
Raven matrices anon
what about them? can you compose and type up a complete sentence, or is that too hard?
if IQ tests are culturally relative as shitlibs and black advocates claim, they could be fine tuned.
Erecting a lot of strawmans there anon.
>fine-tuning of IQ tests
When whites use IQ to insult you its unquestionable fact and to be worshipped as the gospel.
When you use IQ to insult whites it's pseudoscience skewed by systemic racism and biased researchers.
>white american iq declining
>less lead in water
and what, a whopping 4 points or something? study was done in 2002, so surely iq points are almost at white levels by 2022? of course not lol.
>we are lowering the standards so big dumb stupid retarded monkeys score better
cope and seethe dumb dumb
Sepehr needs meds
whats the iq of african americans in 2022?
Cool. Are the crime statistics going down with their improved intelligence?
Can anyone explain what the supposed "cultural bias" in IQ tests is supposed to be? It's just geometric shapes, all cultures have been exposed to them afaik