>be me
>don't want a gf
>play games and watch movies
>"wow, these love stories are so nice"
>want gf now
>learn that real women are literally incapable of any love, loyalty, empathy and accountability
>don't want a gf
>but now feel like something is missing
>and there is nothing to fill the void
>sad
>learn that real women are literally incapable of any love, loyalty, empathy and accountability
An untrue cope. They are just incapable of it with men who aren't tall and have handsome face. And yes, it is still genuine romantic love. It just is only limited to 20% of men.
The void feeling is your brain having developed for this purpose above all others. That is what it is to be human, to have romantic love.
If you date a woman that is 28+ there is a 0% chance that she actually loves you, it' just her biological clock telling her that is time to get babies.
Utter bullshit, there of these four things aren't even exclusevely about partnership
Does having a handsome man around just unlocks woman's hidden ability to hold real consistent principles to example?
And maybe we have a different understanding of what love is, but for me it's a deep unbreakable emotional connection between two unique individuals who found combination of qualities that form the person they got with uniquly dear to their heart
Romantic love isn't about partnership.
>maybe we have a different understanding of what love is
You dropped the specifiers from in front of love that is pertinent to this conversation: genuine and romantic. Be honest in discussion. You have changed the topic to suit your position. What you are describing is platonic love. Familial love is also a thing. Both are distinct from romantic love.
You are married to an insect whore that eats the shit out of mens anuses and sucks down the turds into her bimbo gullet. Post your whore wifes asshole, retard.
>platonic love
if platonic love isn't a foundation of some kind of love, it dosen't deserve to be called that
then it's not love, that's why i said that women are incapable of it
>Does having a handsome man around just unlocks woman's hidden ability to hold real consistent principles to example?
Yes. And anyone who isn't ugly knows this for a fact. Women are fundamentally different both physically and psychologically with handsome men. You would know if you were handsome. Its like being a part of a secret club that no one else except women and handsome men can look into or ever really learn much about apart from that it exists.
>Women are fundamentally different both physically and psychologically with handsome men
Why are we pretending that this doesn't go both ways
because it dosen't
relationship between women and men are always a game havely rigged against men in every single way
Don't know what you're talking about or mentioning "we" or any other such fag nonsense. Don't be a retard fag.
As for the idea about men behaving with women as women behave with men, all avenues of evidence that exist point to the opposite, and the only method of argument available to you on this idea is "just trust me bro". The data is very clear that individual men find a different 80% of women attractive and lovable, whereas women cluster in their preferences for the same 20% of men, so that regardless of where the woman is from or what she likes, she will find the same men attractive as other women.
The data on casual sex, relationships, marriage, and marriage satisfaction all back up that women are fundamentally affected by handsome men in a way men are not affected by beautiful women. Women psychologically revolve around handsome men, men simply want to fuck beautiful women. That's all there is to it. Simple as.
> The data is very clear that individual men find a different 80% of women attractive and lovable, whereas women cluster in their preferences for the same 20% of men, so that regardless of where the woman is from or what she likes, she will find the same men attractive as other women.
None of that is true.
At all.
Women have GREATER variability in what they find attractive than do men! The phenomenon that women place a LIW value on the appearance of men *has a name for it* - hypergamy.
You have it backwards, idiot
Cope and seethe. Data won't change because you say it isn't what it is. Height explains 90% of womens sex and reproductive outcomes, and face 9 of the other 10%. 1% is down to all other factors combined: personality, behavior, status, income, education, etc. all fit in the remaining 1%.
>pretend science from pretend people
Total malarky
Hypergamy means
>women value male appearance far less than other factors
Yes, fucking really. Look it up idiot
Hypergamy is the race to secure a very narrow phenotype, not for variety.
They settle for variety, but hypergamy causes them to always be dissatisfied, and to be looking for opportunities to be railed by that rare phenotype that is the only type that they truly find arousing.
How the fuck ignorant ARE you?
>https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095953889
>https://people.howstuffworks.com/culture-traditions/cultural-traditions/hypergamy.htm
>https://www.thefreedictionary.com/hypergamous
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergamy
your retarded sentences are BACKWARDS.
Women turn down tall, good-looking losers for successful ugly men all the time.
If you talked to women you'd know that
>woman married a moneybag, fucked a chad hobo on the side
it's incredible how you people can't see the obivious
Why are you so aggressively bluepilled anon? Never seen an autist defend bluepill to that degree. Are you at least handsome and don't want to admit that your success was just pure luck?
I can read and do math.
Sue me
Shitty data based on self reporting that you manipulate to tell you an outcome you already had in your head going in? Everyone knows that is not real.
No.
Actual research, not some blogger asking you to buy his ebook
>picrel
id, ego and super-ego
that makes no fucking sense
So she never had complicted internal monologue, never really belived in anything, never acted on anything beyond emotional impulses, insticts and whims, never stoo for her principles for the sake of it, not because of stubborn ego or in attempt to look good, etc
But a handsome man comes around and she turns full human?
I'am starting to think we are talking about different things
Indeed. You are talking nonsense and I am talking reality.
no, you are just an idiot whithout reading comprehension
Blah blah blah
Don't effeminately homosexualily change the topic to try to win. Be a man and reason like a man. Why introduce nonsense terms about philosophy to try to seem intelligent when you are a dunce and we are not even talking about those subjects beyond your cognitive abilities to begin with?
Women respond primally in their brains in a fundamentally different way, in the same way a mother might care for her infant because of instinct and it is a deep and meaningful familial love despite no thought of philosophy (brought up by a airhead fag desperate to change the topic), a woman lusts for a Chad because of the romantic love instinct and it has similar depth and meaning.
YOU are the one who was to stupid to understand the topic I set, i know better what we were discussing because i'am the one opening the fucking discussion.
As i said, if you can't explain that, you should shut up.
You didn't
So SHUT THE FUCK UP
explain how exactly having a chad around could turn a woman into an actual philosopher or a die-hard patriot or shit up already
>An untrue cope. They are just incapable of it with men who aren't tall and have handsome face
So it exists but it doesn't exist for me. Nice. I really needed that autistic correction anon.
>And yes, it is still genuine romantic love.
In the same way wanting a woman as a fleshlight that talks is genuine romantic love, sure.
Using a man as a status object is just as bad as using a woman as a sex object.
Mentally healthy people do not do those things
>Mentally healthy
is literally a codeword for "obiodient conformist cattle"
and what exactly cattle dosen't do?
step back from the table, stop foaming at the mouth in rage
try to type a coherent sentence when you return, incel
concession accepted
uncle ted once again proven right
You
>have you even so far as to ever not bergargie?
Anon
>WTF?
You
>HA! I WIN!
>MENTALLY HEALTHY ?!?!?! [incoherent gibberishs of a madman]
As i said, concession accepted. conformist cattle
>Unlike those conformist cattle *I* will die a virgin!
Well done
>sex
?
>and he again dosen't even know what we are talking about
i'am amazed, i don't think you once grasped what you have been arguing against in this thread, it's incedible, good god what a retarded npc you are, a fucking dog baring at anyone questioning things despite not even understanding what is the question about
You
>i don't think you once grasped what you have been arguing against in this thread
Also you
>is literally a codeword for "obiodient conformist cattle"
>and what exactly cattle dosen't do?
>is literally a codeword for "obiodient conformist cattle"
and what exactly cattle dosen't do?
Also you
>concession accepted
>uncle ted once again proven right
You haven't written a coherent sentce since I hoined this thread, including the one I am replying to.
Protip: this
was my first post
your poor reading comprehension is your problem, shut up and don;t bother me with it
>is literally a codeword for "obiodient conformist cattle"
>and what exactly cattle dosen't do?
>it's incedible, good god what a retarded npc you are, a fucking dog baring
it isn't MY problem, can't-write-man
Maybe I'm the one incapable of love
Trying to view it from the outside I ask myself "If I was a girl, could I love *me* " with my current living situation and track record of failure and repugnant hedonistic ways
i probably could have loved a female me
>repugnant hedonistic ways
1) as if women are different. They are even worse cause they have the opportunity to be even more hedonistic. You touching your pee pee and thinking this is hedonism is just your mental illness that wants you to be miserable.
2)What women want vs what women give is laughable. Practically every guy deserves a woman if we were equal (like women try to lie) and equally contributed to the relationships.
i'm actually the opposite. seeing romance in movies makes me cringe and lessens my desire for a gf
>movies
no wonder
nah, same goes for other media too. it's just annoying. unless the mc has suffered enough, it feels undeserved for them to get love
>it feels undeserved for them to get love
>deserved
let me help you with cleaning your brain from retarded propaganda
You don't DESERVE love, you just get it
Because love is an admiration of what you already are
Of your unique identity
Some people of course can be conventionally more or less admirable than others, but it's not really relevant for love is not a prince to win
It's either there or it's not
i can separate real life from fiction, thank you. it's just i can't enjoy a story if a mc has girls lining up for his dick when his personality isn't all that
there's nothing satisfying about a mc effortlessly winning the affection of women
Stop watching harem anime maybe?
In normal stories there is one romantic interest
>Of your unique identity
It has nothing to do with your identity. It is demonstrably and conclusively down to height and facial handsomeness. But yes, it is genetic and fixed. You are either romantically lovable to all women or romantically lovable to none.
> It is demonstrably and conclusively down to height and facial handsomeness
Multiple studies show attractiveness has no bearing on a man marrying.
Over 1 in 16 women is married to a man shorter than she is
>inb4 huuuuuurrrrrrr a Virgin wife married to you for 90 years cannot LURVE you because of your cheekbones duuurrrrrrrrrrrrr
>no bearing on a man marrying.
impressive. very nice, now pray tell, how many of these women rode a cock carousel before settling down, and how many of them still cheat on their living moneybags?
> how many of these women rode a cock carousel before settling down, and how many of them still cheat on their living moneybags?
Statistically?
12% and
4%
>It is demonstrably and conclusively down to height and facial handsomeness
what a retard
The studies in the pic are NOT "surveys".
They looked at men *actually in long-term relationships* and had make researchers use metrics and tests to evaluate their facial and physical attractiveness and personalities.
The result?
>Personality trumps face, everytime
But go on, post a link to a "stufy"
>Said "study" = grad student homework where 12 sorority sisters without dates on a Friday night were given a 4 question survey and 7 of them said they liked tall men
again. woman uses a simping moneybag as a base to return to after riding chads
women don't love at all, all they chase resoureses and revel in hedomism and narcissim, nothing else
that real women are literally incapable of any love, loyalty, empathy and accountability
stop treating LULZ as anything but a joke
Normie tier take. people would rather believe in a comforting lie than face a harsh reality
Incel tier take - people who actually communicate with women do, yes, know them better that people who don't.
That's a fallacy
you don't need to directly interact with an object to study it,
Stephen Hawking never visited space you know
But if Stephen Hawking told you that black holes are X and a ton of non-scientists told you he was wrong about black holes, who would you believe?
90% of men actually interact with women - even have GFs and are married. They agree that women are capable of love and so on.
A handful of incels disagree.
Guess who wins the credibility competition?
>I secretly know the truth that everyone else avoids
Sure you do. Is mommy awake yet?
>my points
Your only "points" are unsupportable statements of personal opinion with no basis in fact.
One who has fucking proofs
there is no data, no statistics, nothing but
>"my meathole is not like that and that means you are wong"
(but evety time one is questioned deeper it turns out she is and he was just making exuses and sugarcoating)
And even if it was true(it's not), still not fucking proof, just a statement that there is an exeption to the rule
Do you have a wive/gf now?
see ya in another
>"howcould this happen, i'am so sad" story in a week-2.5 years
>literal argument from authority
Stephen hawking isnt correct because hes stephen hawking you brainless retard. Hes correct because he presents hypotheses, supporting data that shows his hypotheses, and methodology for repeatability of his studies. You say you touched a vagina once therefore are more correct than an incel, without actually providing any sort of data or methodology, nor even really a hypothesis other than "no u wrong lul". Get fucked and try and learn about fallacies before attempting logic. Start with "appeal to authority"
>me no know argument from authority not real, duuurrrrrrrrrrr
>spelled out that argument from authority is a fallacy
Reread the post
Congratulations, you have no point. We will gladly accept your concession on this argument
out that argument from authority is a fallacy
The point is, you semi-literate imbecile, is that "appeal to authority" *isn't a fallacy*, fucknuggest.
Argumentum ad Verecundiam is an *informal* fallacy meaning that IF you mention a non-authority it MIGHT lead to a fallacy.
Further, in that *analogy* (look it up, have someone with an education explain the big words to you) the comparison was between someone with actual knowledge and ignorant morons.
You fail twice, dumbfuck.
Is being as stupid and ignorant as you are painful, or are you just oblivious?
>right now three or four anons are furiously looking up "appeal to authority" and really upset that you are correct
By this definition the bluepilled anon is still wrong, as hes asserting himself as an authority and presenting as though this means his arguments are correct. Also, a person's authority has no bearing on the actual merit of their arguments, which was my entire point in my post. But i will cede the definition of appeal to authority to you. Be less angry
>hes asserting himself as an authority
not correct and irrelevant.
>a person's authority has no bearing on the actual merit of their arguments
false and retarded. Does your Aunt Tilly that dropped out of high school have as much of a right to tell you how to treat cancer as a board-certified oncologist?
No, you retard, she doesn't.
>Be less angry
Pal, I am laughing my ass off at retards that can't use a dictionary for words like 'hypergamy' but INSIST they can read the minds of all women.
Comedy gold.
>false and retarded. Does your Aunt Tilly that dropped out of high school have as much of a right to tell you how to treat cancer as a board-certified oncologist
Now youre not understanding my point. Youre sayint x person and y person arent comparable, im saying the argument for the treatment presented by the oncologist would have to be backed on more than just his being an oncologist if you dug into the specific methodology and evidence used to reach that treatment option. You trust his ability and opinion as a layman, but if you actually look into the arguments and such(as we are doing in this thread, specific arguments, not just expert opinions) then evidence is required, not just opinion. Dont conflate these two things. Anons are presenting actual points on female psychological studies, anecdotes, whatever else, so some idiot saying theyre an expert and therefore everyone else is wrong has not only no bearing but negative bearing. What we need is evidence to form actual conclusions
>You trust his ability and opinion as a layman, but if you actually look into the arguments and such(as we are doing in this thread, specific arguments, not just expert opinions)
False and my point.
Only one side in this thread is presenting specific arguments with details and support.
Hint: it is NOT the "women can't feel love" crew.
THAT has been my point the entire fucking time, you hilarious sperg.
I am laughing at you ranting about "methodologies" when you and your retarded kin just keep saying shit like
>white knight
>NPC
>He doesn't know
>Your wife doesn't REALLY love you, *I know*
>you can't see the obvious
and so on WITH NO PROOF except
>bro, dude, just, like, trust me bro
without anything to back it up but more
>Dude. Bro. Dudebro!
over and over.
meanwhile in additional to personal anecdotes the opposition has this
actual scientific analysis of existing relationships and, if you track it down, the full details and methodlogies.
To make this so clear even you with your sub-60 IQ can get it
YOU are the idiot claiming you are an expert but the OTHER GUY is the one backing up his opinion with facts, methodologies, and so on.
You're just too stupid to realize it after I have been telling you that for almost an hour.
lol is that you in that pic?
because this homosexual looks exactly like one who would make those retarded points
hope she sees it. bro, i would say if it wasn't clear your gf is made up
>lol is that you in that pic?
I pulled that pic off /b/ about 2017, moron
>retarded points
I notice you still haven't coughed up any support, loser.
>False and my point.
What do you mean false and your point? As in what i said is false but its also your point?
>Only one side in this thread is presenting specific arguments with details and support.
Hint: it is NOT the "women can't feel love" crew.
THAT has been my point the entire fucking time, you hilarious sperg.
I am laughing at you ranting about "methodologies" when you and your retarded kin just keep saying shit like
Oh, false as in youre the only one doing it. Not sure why youre on attack mode so hard when im not one of the anons taking a side, im viewing the points you guys are making and poking holes where its faulty, or attempting to. Harder to poke holes in the other anon points because just the whole posts are baseless assertions, but then in my mind that makes them self evidently bad points not really in need of highlighting like i said here
Not really any arguing to be done when they continually just insult and make claims, unless you enjoy bashing your head against a wall
>I am laughing at you ranting about "methodologies" when you and your retarded kin just keep saying shit like
You responded to the wrong anon
I copy pasted the text in the post, it didnt greentext for some reason but you can see where the syntax shifts from him to me, right after that actually
such thing as authority only exists for mormalfags
nice samefagging
Note: after looking it up they learned anon was correct and they were wrong.
>semi-literate imbecile
>fallacy
>Argumentum ad Verecundiam
>big words
It is funny to see an incel argue with other incels that women aren't picky at all. Cause everyone knows those fancy words got you absolutely nowhere with women who say they value personality.
>people with an adjumacation cannot into women
Kek
I have a smoking hot big tiddy wife and it was not because of my ugly mug, loser
>my repeated unsupported assertions about women cannot be mocked!
Yes. They can.
I didnt make any points about women, i merely pointed out how your response to those anons was fallacious so you need to come up with another response to assail their points
>"Sure, you replied to their unsupported opinions with actual scientific analysis, BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUT"
every fucking time
Alright youre clearly memeing
you are clearly incapable of reading
>long term relationships
Isnt the entire point about actual female love, which neither of you seem to be producing anything about? Start by defining your terms instead of talking past each other. What do you mean by love and what do they mean by it, and so forth
You're missing the point. The core argument of the retarded incels is that women are only capable of loving a certain exceptionally rare phenotype that MUST BE rather tall and very handsome.
They have never supported this with anything but repetition and mis-using words and phrases they didn't know the meanings of.
By pointing out that research shows that women don't actually care much about male appearance their only point, the unsupported personal opinion that women only want the most handsome of men, is now unsupportable.
Make sense?
No you moron
women are incapable of love AT ALL, not with chads, not with billionares, they just don't have the capacity for love
And forming relationship isn't a proof of love you idiot
>women are incapable of love AT ALL
[citation needed]
c'mon, where are the studies? The methodologies? Any day now, McFly!
do you think i have links for everything i ever read?
go find some incel database if you want detailed answers
>I have NO IDEA where my very strongly held opinions come from and have NO WAY of supporting them! But *I KNOW* that your opinions and all of those scientific research papers that back you up ae WRONG and BAD because you do not agree with me and my unsupportable opinion!
Edited for accuracy
Anon
>back up your statement
You
>can't, lol
Tell me mommy didn't hug you enough but use different words
>women are incapable of love AT ALL
Thank you!
>literral reddet phrases
you don't even mask yourselves
I've never been to plebbit. Why have you?
> women are incapable of love AT ALL
I dare you to say that to your mommy next time she brings you a hot pocket
Yeah, so address their points logically and present your own data for your own hypotheses. Its hard when they just say whatever, but if they demonstrate themself repeatedly as being clearly bad faith then just dont bother responding and move on. Its like arguing religion almost
>Yeah, so address their points logically and present your own data for your own hypotheses
I did.
Try to keep up.
You
>wimmenz cant LURVE! It is SCIENCE!
A
Kek
>this post is the best argument bluepills can provdie
>uhm inkwell chad says women are nice tho
maybe if you normalhomosexuals had any counterarguments to show for all the mountains of both reliable data and millions of detailed anecdotes collected in support of such view, besides
>"i know better because my penis touched meathole"
someone would have listened to you
(and even that part you can't really prove)
>the mountains of both reliable data
Show me a study that says "women are incapable of love" you dick obsessed retard, and explain the millions of tales of loyal wives throughout history
>millions of tales of loyal wives
and if each of these individual cases were studied deeper you would have found that something else kept them there
there are alot of studies explaining the manner of female atrraction and general behavour
You can put them together yourself, it;s easy, only reason scientists didn't do it is because elites enforce gynocentrism
This
is my defenition of love
>it's a deep unbreakable emotional connection between two individuals who found combination of qualities that form the person they got with uniquly dear to their heart
and now say with a stright face that women are capable of that
i wish i could see your fucking lying mug as you force this bullshit through your teeth
>there are alot of studies explaining the manner of female atrraction and general behavour
translation
>"There are zero studies that even imply women cannot love or have loyalty"
>now say with a stright face that women are capable of that
Why wouldn't I? I know women like that. Hell, I am married to a woman like that.
let me guess
>you looked for someone for a long time
>you took all initiative
>you are a normalhomosexual or had to force yourself to behave like one
>she had someone before you
>you are fitter or/and taller than her
>you are smarter than her
>you are more successful and wealthy and most of your mutual posessions are actually just yours
>she dosen't really share your interest or unique views
i could go longer but that's enough
how many of these are true? i can bet almoust all are
because you weren't loved, she just picked you like a coat or a pair of boots that looked better at the moment, you are a thing and a resourse
you are nothing for her beyond your function
>let me guess
Ok, this will be funny
>you looked for someone for a long time
Nope. I was only 22 when we met by chance.
>you took all initiative
Nope. She often called or even surprised me by flying to see me unannounced
>you are a normalhomosexual or had to force yourself to behave like one
Guilty - I am not in the 2% of raging incels
>she had someone before you
Nope. First bf ever.
>you are fitter or/and taller than her
Of course I am! I am a MAN, she is a WOMAN!
>you are smarter than her
Yes.
>you are more successful and wealthy and most of your mutual posessions are actually just yours
Before she got pregnant and became a stay at home mom she outearned me. I was successful *after* that
>she dosen't really share your interest or unique views
She does, actually
>i could go longer but that's enough
how many of these are true? i can bet almoust all are
You lose
>Of course I am! I am a MAN, she is a WOMAN!
This proves his point and disproves yours. She is with you for your height. That's why she was so eager. Simple as.
You
>"I know what you and her are like"
[proves you don't]
And after that you still claim to know more about my wife than I do.
It is a puzzle why you are single
If you were shorter than your wife, 90% chance she would not be with you to begin with. You try to hide from the simple fact that all the love she has for you is conditional, not even for intrinsic qualities but based on physical representations of your genes. If you were even one inch shorter than your wife, statistically she probably wouldnt have wanted to even marry you in the first place. Wake up and smell the coffee you RETARDED nagger.
Men are taller than women, in general. Sure.
>You try to hide from the simple fact that all the love she has for you is conditional, not even for intrinsic qualities but based on physical representations of your genes
pure retardation.
She already knew guys taller than me and ignored them all.
She knew guys better looking than me and ignored them all.
>If you were very differet she *probably*
Yeah, and if I had been born a billionaire I would never have met her.
You keep switching from rather vague, general, not-universal statements and physicality
>your wife probably likes that you are tall
to extremely specific statements about the internal mental and emotional attitude of someone you will never meet
>TheREFore She ONlY LOvEs You BECausE You ARE TaLL!!!!!!!!
My wife has big tits. Really nicely formed, very full, D cup tits when we met.
NGL, I love 'em.
Now, it is a fact, indisputable fact, that the majority of men find big tits more attractive.
But I met (and dated! And fucked!) women with bigger tits without loving them. What attracted me to my wife *as a spouse* wasn't the massive rack or the bright blue eyes, but her as a person. If, heaven forfend, she got breast cancer and lost her tits I would still love her.
Considering that every single bit of research proves men are FAR more focused on physical beauty than are women *and* the fact she spurned taller and better looking men than me, why should I not expect her love for me to also move far beyond the physical traits that led to initial attraction?
Nothing. And posted here
we know, for a fact, male looks don't matter much to women. So the assumption must be women are just as capable of love and betrayal as a man.
Grow up.
>"Ok, ok, ok, ok, ok, OK! So "hypergamy" *doesn't* mean women are all after Chad! BUT WMEN ARE ALL AFTER CHAD, WE SWEAR!!!!"
You guys don't even knw any women, do you?
You are either a delusonal chad whithout self awareness with a retarded bimbo wife that SOMEHOW found a way here, or you are a white knight fanatic that makes shit up to support his ideologically rooted point
second is more probable for obivous reasons
go back to your npc site you fat homosexual
>no one in the world is in a good marriage because women are incapable of love. I read it on a blog, once, so it must be true. All counter examples are fake
Did the UFO drop off bigfoot to build you a death ray, too?
yes, at least 85% of marriages are bullshit
you thought you got me there didn't you?
>"I have never felt the touch of a woman but *I KNOW* that all those married people with their homes and their children are secretly not really in love. Trust me, I know women."
Yes. this is correct.
you are funny fella. expecting me to be as insecure as you are
>tall normalhomosexual
case is concluded
>Hell, I am married to a woman like that.
Nobody tell him. oregano.
Incels
>"My oneitis won't leave her BF even though he is sumb and mean and doesn't treat her like *I* would treat her! Why does she stay with such an asshole? A-bloo-bloo-bloo!"
Also incels
>"Women have no love or loyalty"
projecting and literally puting words in other people's mouths
i'am not arguing with a moron who can't even attack my points and has to make up irrelevant bullshit
TRP cope women are incapable of loving (You) cause you're ugly and/or spergy
i'am not ugly,
And you just proven my point, if women were capable of love there would have been those who take interest in "spergy" people too
No, that's platonic and familial love you're dishonestly describing, not romantic love. Romantic love involves a sexual passion inspired by physical appearance.
platonic love is the only real love
shit you are desribing wears off in two years
>be me
>socialized to expect a disney princess
>tfw disney princesses are unrealistic unobtainable representations of femininity that do not exist in the real world
>tfw ive trained to be disappointed in all women for no reason at all
homosexual stawman, in the thread i layed out what i expected,
fictional romance just made me take interest in the subject
Get a waifu nagger, like picrel
Already have one now,
i await technolgy to allow her to enter our wolrd
Godspeed waifubro, that day will come soon
How about realizing that feeling that way and just stopping?
Read the god damn Stoa you weak willed piece of meat. Take utter and total control of your own self.
That way you will also learn that there are only 2 things in life:
1. Things you can controll
2. Things you can't controll
Do not complain about 1. because why? You can control it just change it.
Do not complain about 2. because why? You can't change it so what is the point of complaining.
There are no excuses.
Thats what my gf told me this morning after she said she loved me and we had amazing sex
>Be somewhat bored at the moment.
>Don't want hookups because fear of STDs.
>Don't want to date because trying to be someone's fantasy all the time makes me feel like an underpaid whore.
>Don't want to be married or a parent because those people live life on 8 dicked elephant assfucking nightmare mode.
>Guess I'll just hang out with the bros.
White knights are most pathetic "people" on earth
honestly, they are on the same level of dignity as a child grooming tranny
I don't know why you people even bother to kick those morons, just ingore them
You know they are wrong, and they do to, that's the reason they so furiously yell their mantras
Ok, reasonable people left, only discord raiders remained
OP here:
Thread is closed,
conclusion: not only women are shitty and stupid people, their enables are just as bad
>we got our asses kicked by a guy that can read, abandon thread
FTFY
>be me
>want gf
>get qt gf
>realize they waste your time
>gotta be accountable for lots of shit now
>mine in particular wanted sex all the time and expected me to put in all the work
>now dont want a gf anymore
>gotta be accountable for lots of shit now
Were you dating your teacher or something?
>wanted sex all the time
Oh. Youre a homosexual. Sure
have to go pick her up at work, have to hang out all the time, have to visit her family, have to be liked by her friends, etc
it's tiring as fuck, also sex isn't really fun cause im not experienced (was virign b4 her) and she wants orgasms all the time so i have to put in overtime since she doesn't know/refuses to ride my cock until she cums herself
>I have to, like, SOEND TIME WITH HER, and, like HER FAMILY, and shit!
>and when we fuck she, like, WANTS TO CUM and other retarded shit!
Like I said
ura homosexual
no just turns out im a sigma male and didnt know it
>sigma male
no such thing, homosexual
Holy fucking shit is Ryan Gosling wearing a Casio watch? Literally me fr fr!
>be me
>don't want a gf
>play games and watch movies
>"wow, these love stories are so nice"
>want gf now
>find online gf
>talk
>randomly lose interest after a day
This is apparently all I'm capable of
Find a girl with borderline who lovebombs you until she splits and ruins everything. Who knows, maybe you're tough enough to deal with it and can keep her