At exactly how many cell divisions does Jesus decide to infuse the embryo with a soul, and by which process does this occur?

At exactly how many cell divisions does Jesus decide to infuse the embryo with a soul, and by which process does this occur?
I couldn't find it on the bible.

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    How should I know? I'm just a clump of cells.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    three.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Thanks bro. How does he do it, again? I'm preparing a class for Sunday church, you see.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        sry, forgot 2nd question.
        He does it by.....idk......He pulls it out of His ass.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Thanks again, bro.
          I knew I could count on this board for answering the hard questions.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Well, for starters you're trying to understand a Catholic discipline through Protestant means. Catholicism derives that discipline from sacred tradition, which they hold as being equal with the Bible. Learn and understand your sacred tradition and you'll get your answer.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The soul is in the golgi apparatus.

    • 2 years ago
      Dmitri

      I don't have a golgi apparatus O_O

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Are you a robot?

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    When the sperm cell meets the egg -- Boom. Ensoulment.

    You've got the requisite DNA for a new human person. That DNA will never change. Just add food and water, and before you know it they're responding to threads like this.

    Even absent ensoulment, however, the embryo deserves legal protection, just as the law protects American Bald Eagle eggs, although there's no question of any ensoulment there -- it's just a matter of seeing the obvious connection between the egg and the eagle.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      And if the DNA is genetically engineered to be different? At what point does the soul become washed clean of sin? If your whole personality and memories and body were changed, then does your soul persist or do you gain a new soul? When does the first soul die? What the frick is a soul anyway?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >What the frick is a soul anyway?

        "The spiritual principle of human beings. The soul is the subject of human consciousness and freedom; soul and body together form one unique human nature. Each human soul is individual and immortal, immediately created by God. The soul does not die with the body, from which it is separated by death, and with which it will be reunited in the final resurrection."
        Source: https://www.catholic.com/qa/what-exactly-is-a-soul (quoting Catholic Catechism)

        As for the rest of your questions, they're real head-scratchers. I don't know. But there are probably theologians in the Vatican thinking about this stuff. See, e.g., William Saletan's report on a bioethics conference at the Vatican:

        >The first presenters, a couple of scientists, summarize the state of stem cell research. When they’re done, a soft-spoken young priest in the front row raises his hand. “In a case of aneuploidy, it may be possible to laser ablate one or two of the blastomeres,” he says. A priest in the back row asks about “aberrant silencing of the IGF and IGF2 receptor.” I can hardly believe what I’m hearing. Afterward, I ask the first priest, Father Tad Pacholczyk, where he learned this stuff. Turns out he’s got a Ph.D. in neuroscience from Yale, plus a research stint at Harvard Medical School and undergraduate degrees in biochemistry and molecular biology. Around the room, half the guys in collars are scientists. A couple of weeks ago, there was a conference here on the concept of brain death, which the Vatican is reconsidering in light of new findings.
        https://slate.com/technology/2005/03/jews-vs-catholics-in-the-stem-cell-debate.html

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Human behavior is easily modeled without free will or souls. The only question that remains is how consciousness works. But the soul doesn’t actually help us explain that.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Human behavior is easily modeled by a number of untrue things.

            >As for the rest of your questions, they're real head-scratchers
            Yeah, hard to come up with even more israeli bullshit in the face of absurdly overwhelming evidence of the opposite being true.

            Links to studies?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >As for the rest of your questions, they're real head-scratchers
          Yeah, hard to come up with even more israeli bullshit in the face of absurdly overwhelming evidence of the opposite being true.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Damn, god kills a frickton of zygotes with souls then

      seems pretty fricked up

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        imagine spending eternity as a disembodied zygote.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >A eukaryotic cell is a person with rights
      You seriously expect me to believe this nonsense?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It's true regardless of whether you or anyone else believes it or likes it.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It's clearly not true.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Not an argument.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Your view does not merit a counter-argument. It only merits an incredulous stare.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            4/10 cope. Saves dignity, rhetorically compact, but admits very apparently that you have nothing.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >A Black person is a person with rights
        You seriously expect me to believe this nonsense?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >>A eukaryotic cell is a person with rights
        >You seriously expect me to believe this nonsense?

        That's not the claim. The claim is that if federal law protects eagle eggs - and indeed it does - it could, by similar logic, deign to protect a unique human life in the woman, regardless of the issue of ensoulment, regardless even of whether human beings have souls (nobody is claiming that eagles have souls, much less eagle eggs).

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Read up on the spark of light that literally happens when conception is successful. There's light that appears as a flash. It's very dim but it's there.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Read up on the spark of light that literally happens when conception is successful.

      Yes. This. Fascinating, isn't it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The after life must be full of single celled fertilized eggs that never implanted.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Not a Christian but I would say it's at conception by the Lockian concept of self.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >I-I need Jesus to believe in hoomaaanz!!
    Is this the power of atheism and abortionist?

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >At exactly how many cell divisions does Jesus-
    Stopped reading there.

    Enjoy your autistic thread lmao

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      whatever points out the absurdity of your iron age superstitions is blanking out your mind?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Not listing the amount of cells necessary to sustain a soul... is absourd? Anon, you have legitimate autism. I'm not joking.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Not an argument.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            It's a question. One that you're clearly uncomfortable with.
            For me to provide an argument there would be something else than a mere personal preference on your part. Which is what cell count is.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          not being able to address the issue in any way is an indication that no real knowledge lies behind your claims. you just make shit up as the argument progresses.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >whenever a claim is valid, there is a cell count
            Source?

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Christcucks aren't pro-life, they're pro-death that only seek to have the time to indoctrinate those children whose life is in question.
    The real pro-life are humanists that recognize the unborn as human beings deserving rights, protection, dignity and respect.

    Science says we're human beings from zygote to elderly. That human life starts at conception right as the gametes merge their DNA, a new individual has formed.
    I trust the science.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >The real pro-life are humanists that recognize the unborn as human beings deserving rights, protection, dignity and respect.

      Would that there were more such persons, but it seems to me that there are passingly few that are pro-life in the sense you describe who are not religious, usually in fact Christian.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Chad.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *