Are you ever afraid that you will end up completely alone, surrounded by obscure books and your brain filled with useless knowledge making you unable ...

Are you ever afraid that you will end up completely alone, surrounded by obscure books and your brain filled with useless knowledge making you unable to connect to anything other than your books?

Because I am.

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Is that necessarily bad? I think only if you really wanted to connect to something else but were unable to. But if you only like your book and you're neither leeching off nor hurting anyone else...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I already had sex hundreds of times and spent several years in multiple relationships, so I’m actually looking forward to this. Ideally I’d want a good friend, been considering to reconnect with my college buddies lately, they shared my interests. Women on the other hand are trash once you get to know them, I’m absolutely content in voluntary celibacy.

      Its an aspiration

      >Are you ever afraid that you will end up completely alone,
      That's an accomplishment. You want to be a normalhomosexual? Lmaooooo

      As Cioran said the task of the solitary is to become more solitary.

      Watch these two videos and answer again

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The guy's problem is he's just a midwit

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I'm looking forward to being an old guy with a playground for my hobby and doing what I like for retirement. That sounds like a based life.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Do you think Ebert's astrology readings work? I am considering to pay him for it. You can always trust bald men to have integrity.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        tldw

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        [Remove]

        Jesus... that was something. I was not ready for the medium, castrated male stuff . How do we not have a lit version of kiwifarms. With this guy and Dan Schneider and all troony academics there is material there

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You could add Greg Sadler and his troony son.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Grace Lavery would on any lolcow list, either here or /fa.
            that guy is autogynephilia personified.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Greg Sadler and his troony son.
            ???

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          This seems like a manic/delusional episode fueled by booze or something. Not surprising it was triggered by some divorce drama with the wife doing sleazy shit. But still.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Why keep it up tho?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I found it very soulful.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Is that necessarily bad?
      Yeah, it is bad. You wasted your life away.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        what do you consider an unwasted life

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Wasting life
        There's no such thing

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Anon, stop being in denial.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No I'm not gay

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I already had sex hundreds of times and spent several years in multiple relationships, so I’m actually looking forward to this. Ideally I’d want a good friend, been considering to reconnect with my college buddies lately, they shared my interests. Women on the other hand are trash once you get to know them, I’m absolutely content in voluntary celibacy.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >I’m absolutely content in voluntary celibacy.
      Not to get too pedantic but all celibacy is, by definition, voluntary.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        then explain how OP is an incel

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Its an aspiration

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Are you ever afraid that you will end up completely alone,
    That's an accomplishment. You want to be a normalhomosexual? Lmaooooo

    As Cioran said the task of the solitary is to become more solitary.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I would like it, but I would prefer to be closer to nature like Pentti Linkola. Btw, Pentti Linkola died peacefully in his sleep:

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I've dreamed about becoming a hermit and freezing to death when the first cold winter comes, if not dying earlier. Now I just wish for a nuclear holocaust, or a giant meteorite that will turn this planet into a lifeless rock again, just how it should always have been.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If you do it's entirely a failure of character. Many of the greatest minds to ever grace this world also managed to lead socially successful lives and many of them even successfully fathered whole families whilst doing so. If you're high iq and fail at the basics of life it's not because you're some tortured genius who can't fathom the basics of life, it's because you're still just a dysgenic loser selected for rejection from the gene pool.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      raising a family is monkey bullshit for low iq plebs

      Empedocles - no kids, an hero
      Heraclitus - no kids
      Silenus - no kids
      Parmenides - no kids
      Plato - gay homie
      Epicurus - no kids
      Epictetus - no kids
      Seneca - no kids, an hero
      Buddha(not Siddhartha) - no kids
      Bodhidharma - no kids
      Nagarjuna - no kids
      Jesus - no kids
      Abhinavagupta - no kids
      Shankaracharya - no kids
      Mani - no kids
      Al-Kindi - no kids
      Al-Farabi - no kids
      Averroes - no kids
      Avicenna - no kids
      Aquinas - no kids
      Spinoza - no kids
      Kant - no kids
      Pascal - no kids
      Leibniz - no kids
      Hume - no kids
      Kierkegaard - no kids
      Fourier - no kids
      Schopenhauer - no kids
      Stirner - no kids
      Mainländer - no kids, an hero
      Nietzsche - no kids
      Weininger - no kids, an hero
      Michelstaedter - no kids, an hero
      Spengler - no kids
      Wittgenstein - gay homie
      Zapffe - no kids
      Weil - no kids
      Evola - no kids
      Arendt - no kids
      Beauvoir - no kids
      Sartre - no kids
      Debord - no kids, an hero
      Caraco - no kids, an hero
      Cioran - no kids
      Althusser - no kids
      Kripke - no kids
      Feyerabend - no kids
      Foucault - gay homie
      Kaczynski - no kids
      Gray - no kids
      Land - no kids
      Kastrup - no kids
      Brassier - no kids
      Benatar - no kids
      Thacker - no kids

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, I don't want any kids, but I do want to adopt a corgi and treat him like a son. Check out the YouTube channel "Topi the Corgi". It is very cozy.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        > the person that the op refers is answering itt

        You had truly to scratch the barrel if 3/4 of your list are literally 'who?' and obscure philosophers that nobody remembers like Epictetus or randoms like Averroes, that I hardly ever heard of beyond this board

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >are literally 'who?'
          lurk the frick more, pleb.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >obscure philosophers
          >Epictetus
          >Averroes
          Most people with an entry level interest in philosophy know who they are.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >obscure philosophers that nobody remembers like Epictetus
          Ho no no no, natalist sisters...

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Two philosophers who literally helped shape the West, you have to go back

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous
        • 1 year ago
          sage

          shit bait

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            it made you respond so you're beneath it

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          If this isn't bait you are a troglodyte who has no place on this board.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Epictetus
          >Obscure
          This is the kind of moron who has children and thinks he can still write something worthwhile. You can't even raise a child, you simpleton.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Feyerabend - no kids
        He was impotent I think after being shot in WW2

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Anti-natalists really are the most cringe beings. Imagine ending your blood line because you read it in a book lol

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >blood line
          kek, most zoomers don't even know the name of their grandfather's father. that's your bloodline bro

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            so poignant I giggled

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Any life long celibates in there?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          sure but most them were monks/religious philosophers

          Caraco was a celibate till his suicide. he had just one unfortunate sexual encounter with a prostitute after that he chemically burned his dick.

          What about Socrates/Aristotle/Plato?

          plato was a gay homie. Socrates married ironically:

          >“Thus, the philosopher dislikes marriage as well as what might persuade him into it??marriage is a barrier and a disaster along his route to the optimal. What great philosopher up to now has been married? Heraclitus, Plato, Descartes, Spinoza, Leibtniz, Kant, Schopenhauer?? None of these got married. What`s more, we cannot even imagine them married. A married philosopher belongs in a comedy, that`s my principle. And Socrates, the exception, the malicious Socrates, it appears, got married ironically to demonstrate this very principle.

          >Every philosopher would speak as once Buddha spoke when someone told him of the birth his son, "Rahula has been born to me. A shackle has been forged for me." (Rahula here means "a little demon"). To every "free spirit" there must come a reflective hour, provided that previously he has had a one without thought, of the sort that came then to Buddha - "Life in a house," he thought to himself, "is narrow and confined, a polluted place. Freedom consists of abandoning houses;" "because he thought this way, he left the house.”

          ― Friedrich Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morals

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Nietzsche unintentionally makes it very clear here why philosophers never marry and it's not because women are a shackle. Philosophers are simply afraid of the contingency of social interaction. When you're in your own head all the time the world can be whatever you want it. But as soon as you talk to another person your delusions are shattered. I've been there. Classic incel mindset. Fortunately I grew out of it.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            No, its because I am superior to you social herd monkeys.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Schope does have the right to make that claim
            Even his book of essays is a classic

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >stop thinking now! intellectualism and creative freedom are for cowards!
            >you need to listen to woman's demented babbling and make money for her to spend!

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Socrates married ironically
            Every time has their own hipsters it seems.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        What about Socrates/Aristotle/Plato?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          They had families
          that's why presocrats are superior

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Socrates had children at age 60 something because when he died at 70 he mentioned they were still very young.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Also it should be noted this is against the very advice he himself gives in the Republic Book 6 that men shouldn't have kids past 55.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Someone said Nick Land had kids

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          he never posted any prof of his claim other than just trust me bro and btw you gays are creeps who will harass his kids if i gave you the confirmation haha

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Probably because they are hapas.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        No, because I have friends and family, eventually I'll find another woman to fall in love with and instead of just shagging her like all the others I'll have a family, or an extension of my existing family would be more accurate.

        a large number of these (Spinoza and Kant jump out) didn't have kids because they were extreme autists rather than for concrete philosophically justified reasons
        and the gay homies don't count, people who find vegana unappealing also aren't abstaining from reproduction for philosophical reasons, its because the act is extremely difficult for them unless the woman looks more like a twink

        > the person that the op refers is answering itt

        You had truly to scratch the barrel if 3/4 of your list are literally 'who?' and obscure philosophers that nobody remembers like Epictetus or randoms like Averroes, that I hardly ever heard of beyond this board

        >nobody remembers like Epictetus
        come on, you can do better than that

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Jesus - no kids
        either we don't know that this is true or not, or we take the account that says he was childless, in which case he was literally God and we are all his children

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Jordan Peterson - 2 kids

        REFUTED

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Jesus - no kids, an hero*

        Verification not required.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I could not help but notice how you didn't list Chad. Oh, that's right, Chad wasn't an autistic loser like all of the people you listed.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        n-natalistsisters, our response?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Pretty tragic actually. Perhaps if we had some of their genes nowadays floating around in our cesspool of mediocrity then there would actually be some interesting stuff to read.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The greatest writers were ALL outcasts and lonely people.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      moronic as proven by

      raising a family is monkey bullshit for low iq plebs

      Empedocles - no kids, an hero
      Heraclitus - no kids
      Silenus - no kids
      Parmenides - no kids
      Plato - gay homie
      Epicurus - no kids
      Epictetus - no kids
      Seneca - no kids, an hero
      Buddha(not Siddhartha) - no kids
      Bodhidharma - no kids
      Nagarjuna - no kids
      Jesus - no kids
      Abhinavagupta - no kids
      Shankaracharya - no kids
      Mani - no kids
      Al-Kindi - no kids
      Al-Farabi - no kids
      Averroes - no kids
      Avicenna - no kids
      Aquinas - no kids
      Spinoza - no kids
      Kant - no kids
      Pascal - no kids
      Leibniz - no kids
      Hume - no kids
      Kierkegaard - no kids
      Fourier - no kids
      Schopenhauer - no kids
      Stirner - no kids
      Mainländer - no kids, an hero
      Nietzsche - no kids
      Weininger - no kids, an hero
      Michelstaedter - no kids, an hero
      Spengler - no kids
      Wittgenstein - gay homie
      Zapffe - no kids
      Weil - no kids
      Evola - no kids
      Arendt - no kids
      Beauvoir - no kids
      Sartre - no kids
      Debord - no kids, an hero
      Caraco - no kids, an hero
      Cioran - no kids
      Althusser - no kids
      Kripke - no kids
      Feyerabend - no kids
      Foucault - gay homie
      Kaczynski - no kids
      Gray - no kids
      Land - no kids
      Kastrup - no kids
      Brassier - no kids
      Benatar - no kids
      Thacker - no kids

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Schopenhauer and Cioran prove you wrong. Keep on pretending you didn't frick up and become a normie who will only ever write dreck.
      >But Cormac McCarthy has a son!
      So does Stephen King. And they're both popular culture hacks.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        How is McCarthy a culture hack?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Have you read his books? His entire philosophy is a justification of evil because he believes that humans have to be evil, completely ignoring the existence of every sage or ascetic who ever lived. That's not even mentioning that upwards of five of his novels have been turned into mainstream popular movies and normies love his nihilistic dreck. Everything he writes flatters the egos of bad people.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Ebert is a Clarmont Institute connected, Peter Thiel-backed shill

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No, Steve seems a lot happier than I've ever been. I'd be thrilled to be in his position.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Are you ever afraid that you will end up completely alone, surrounded by obscure books and your brain filled with useless knowledge making you unable to connect to anything other than your books?

    It's either that or end up alone but without all that obscure books and useless knowledge. I have confirmed I don't mix in with people through experience. If you're a normie, just stop reading and go socialize and consume VR entertainment on your downtime or something.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >completely alone, surrounded by obscure books and your brain filled with useless knowledge making you unable to connect to anything other than your books
    sounds fricking based

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It doesn't sound awful but I'd much rather be on the level of a George Steiner than a fricking Steven Donoghue though

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I fear not that fate. What I fear is reaching an advanced age still wondering "what if". I fear squandering opportunities only available in one's youth.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Not quite. Surrounded by obscure books and brain filled with useless knowledge sounds good enough, I'm afraid I'll be surrounded by midwit books I didnt even read, and my brain isn't even filled with useless knowledge but with none all

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    THIS IS A STEVE DONOGHUE BOARD

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      quints of truth

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No, I am very specifically afraid of ending up in a group home and tormented by the staff. That is a major concern to me. If I could support myself I wouldn't care so much to yell and belittle people often.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Just kys when you reach that stage. You can probably make it to 80 before you need to be institutionalized.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        No, I am mentally handicapped and my father said I would either have to live with my sister or go to a home.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i’m afraid i’ll end up like pic rel, society is bullshit.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This is a dream for zoomers

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Damn, looking at that image again, Travis really liked his porno mags.

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >useless knowledge

    i know how to write books, poetry, and paint, did you think all i did was consume? i create too.

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm a married woman so no

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Most married people don't stay married. Of those who do, only half can have the pleasure of dying first. There are many ways a person could unexpectedly find themselves alone in old age

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Wisdom isn't a team sport. By the same coin, accumulation of facts we be just as useless as you fear.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >John David Ebert
    Literally the only thing worth watching on YouTube

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You're pathetic for several (really countless) reasons if you believe that.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Not really. I just don't like youtube in general. There is a higher standard of expectation in watching Ebert's lectures

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm a blackpilled incel so I made my peace with that years ago
    I am only interested in useless knowledge, as soon as something becomes useful to me I lose interest in it and it becomes work

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No since there will be a tipping point where I think sentient AI is real and can marry a robot.

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Good chance this happens regardless of what you do. Life is unfair and people are shit. You'll probably be another statistic so don't worry about it so much.

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm already alone and unable to connect to anything. Its what I am.

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >read books
    >get smart
    >use smarts to plan a destiny that can only be fulfilled by your sires beyond your lifetime
    I've had two kids that I'm homeschoooling with my tutor wife.
    One day my family name will be on the side of asteroid mining ships, dynasticism is the future bros

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    why would I be?
    we all technically are born and die alone.

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm finally at a point where I am managing to get dates with girls but they always drop me before we can get to sex or serious so yeah I'm probably going to be alone because I can't take the rejection anymore it makes me upset there's clearly something wrong with me

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >alone, surrounded by obscure books
    Sounds comfy

  30. 1 year ago
    S10241875

    No, because it's almost my dream. I would also like to be able to travel freely around the World.

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    My ultimate life goal is to live alone in the hillside, surrounded by books, and writing books.

    So no

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    not really

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Years ago I quit dating and I decided I will literally only take a 18-20 year old virgin bride. The idea of being the endgame of the kind of roastie who left me because "I still want to make experiences before settling down" to get dicked by random Black folk until 30-35 is unbearable cuckoldry. I hate how promiscuous these prostitutes are. They're literally all completely fine with hookups. Why the frick would I accept to marry a post-wall prostitute whose vegana is a crater and whose ability to love is completely eroded by Black person dick? I know I'll never get a 18 year old virgin who is also worth marrying but it's that or nothing and I can focus on something else in the meantime.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >18-20 year old virgin bride
      >18-20
      >virgin

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        mormons

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          There are other denominations that have "technically virgins" too.

          I know it's impossible. I'm not chasing a delusion. I'm just saying that I'll live my life focusing on other things and if I get someone who fulfills this impossible standard then I'll consider a relationship again. I'm fricking done loving disgusting roasties who fricked random people before being with me. If I wanted to be with a prostitute I'd pay one, less commitment less problems.

          Were all delusional here.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I know it's impossible. I'm not chasing a delusion. I'm just saying that I'll live my life focusing on other things and if I get someone who fulfills this impossible standard then I'll consider a relationship again. I'm fricking done loving disgusting roasties who fricked random people before being with me. If I wanted to be with a prostitute I'd pay one, less commitment less problems.

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm afraid of the opposite. That regardless how much I read my brain will just delete 95% of it and I will not do anything of value with the remaining 5%. So all of it will have come to nothing.

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No and the only reason you would is you consider this behavior as low status

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No, I'm afraid that as old I realize I was afraid to be myself. Being true to myself is more important to me than being popular.

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >useless knowledge
    You shouldn't have read shity books.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *