Are angels considered paranormal like succubi, would it constitute sin if I lewd them on AI? Are there non religious beings that are similar to angels.
Are angels considered paranormal like succubi, would it constitute sin if I lewd them on AI?
Are angels considered paranormal like succubi, would it constitute sin if I lewd them on AI? Are there non religious beings that are similar to angels.
angel cosplayers
mimics
my cat
i hope you dont believe that Lilith is real because that would be blasphemous
There's no such thing as sin. At least, not like you think. Get out of the judeo-christian mindset. Angels aren't "religious".
I made this.
sauce
https://promptchan.ai/r/aChCm74pvacJu4mvDECBlXhzCWl2
>using lame ass renaissance era interpretation of angels instead of the chad biblically accurate angels
ngmi
The blibical angels look like they were taken from hell.
technically true because demons are just angels that rebelled against God
People who think angels are physical beings made of flesh tend to interpret the descriptions of their appearance in a hellish way.
Are they like ghosts.
They project a form and body made of light as a functional appendage, but they don't truly have a form.
Paranormal? yes. Wrong to lewd? No? And there are long, long essays on this.
>In the sixth chapter of Genesis may be found a curious text, which reads:
>"The sons of God saw the daughters of men, that they were fair; and they took them wives of all that they chose."
>The Septuagint originally rendered the words 'Sons of God' by [Greek letters Alpha-Gamma-Gamma-Epsilon-Lambda-Omicron- Iota Tau-Omicron-Upsilon Theta-Epsilon-Omicron-Upsilon], angels of God, and this rendering is found in Philo, de Gigantibus, Eusebius, Augustine and Ambrose.
>This view of Genesis VI 1-4 was held by most of the early fathers.
>See the Book of Enoch, translated from Professor Dillman's Ethiopic Text by R.H. Charles, Oxford, 1893 e.v. In fact, in the Book of Enoch, these sons of God are spoken of all through as angels who wedded earthly women; and it is further stated that these angelic husbands broke the law, living in depravity with their earthly wives, and laying the foundation of evils which required the Deluge to sweep away. Critical scholarship usually holds these angels to be fallen. But St. Augustine protests against this view, saying: "I truly firmly believe that God's angels could never fall so at that time."
>Nevertheless, we find in the Book of Enoch, XV 4:
>"Whilst you were still spiritual, holy, in the enjoyment of eternal life, you have defiled yourselves with women, have begotten (children) with the blood of flesh, and have lusted after the blood of men, and produced flesh and blood, as those produce who are mortal and short-lived."
>Here we see that the angels, whatever their after depravity, were "still holy" when they united themselves as heavenly bridegrooms with earthly women.
http://www.idacraddock.com/bridegrooms.html
>depravity with their earthly wives
How if they were their wives, Did they commited hardcore sex or what?
>when they united themselves as heavenly bridegrooms with earthly women.
Aren't angel women they could marry in heaven?
Does sex happen in heaven.
>whatever their after depravity
They were referring to fallen angels and the angels who got into trouble for producing Nephilim. The ones who were doing stuff with their wives? Still holy.
I have no idea about angels marrying angels as I don't think that one is written anywhere. Just that apparently there are angels who married humans. This is both in the Bible and written about by people like Ida Craddock.
how lewd?
Wearing lingerie and looking like total sluts. Pretty faces with super lewd perfect bodies with huge breasts. Women ready to be impregnanted on sight.
Christianity says lust is a sin, full stop. If you want to beat your meat to sexy beings of any kind you should find a different religion.