ONE WENT ON A THIRTEEN YEAR CIVILIZATORY RAMPAGE THAT INAUGURATED A NEW HISTORICAL EPOCH; ONE AUGMENTED THE DOMAINS OF THE ETERNAL CITY, AND SET THE PRECEDENTS FOR IT TO BECOME A UNIVERSAL EMPIRE; ONE WAS A NARCISSISTIC & BELLICOSE ROTHSCHILD PUPPET, MAKEBELIEVING HIMSELF AN EMPEROR.
Who are some others like this? I want to read more books about people like this
I'm thinking I'll read about Frederick the Great and Gustavia Adolphus next because they're similar
the "master of Europe" anybody who beats all rivals on the continent
Charlemagne, Napoleon, Bismarck, Hitler etc.
Europe was warlike for a long time
What historic archetype would that be? Caesar and Napoleon both subverted the system to become de jure kings, but Alexander WAS the system, seeing as he inherited his throne.
ceasar had more formidable foes and faced more internal adversity, had more cultural impact on modern day society, and his story is overall more comprehensive and interesting
Caesar: badass, still THE symbol of power, incredible aesthetic.
Alexander: educated by Aristotele, his life almost looks like a myth.
Napoleon: small empire, beaten on the battlefield, kitsch aesthetic, resents his origins, nouveau rich and it shows, we can see his sister titties paying a cheap ticket, being Napoleon is universally a cliché of being a lunatic segregated in an asylum
Who are some others like this? I want to read more books about people like this
I'm thinking I'll read about Frederick the Great and Gustavia Adolphus next because they're similar
The problem with Caesar is that he spent his whole life attaining power and when he finally got it, he dies within like 3 months. Alexander for me is the true kino. Led from the front, nonstop adventure. Died drinking
>alexander
>napoleon
>caesar
ONE OF THE THREE IS NOT LIKE THE OTHER TWO.
they're all great men
NOT ALL THREE OF THEM.
who isn't
ONE WENT ON A THIRTEEN YEAR CIVILIZATORY RAMPAGE THAT INAUGURATED A NEW HISTORICAL EPOCH; ONE AUGMENTED THE DOMAINS OF THE ETERNAL CITY, AND SET THE PRECEDENTS FOR IT TO BECOME A UNIVERSAL EMPIRE; ONE WAS A NARCISSISTIC & BELLICOSE ROTHSCHILD PUPPET, MAKEBELIEVING HIMSELF AN EMPEROR.
GUESS WHICH ONE IS NOT GREAT.
anglo detected
?
Caesar is easily the weakest choice of the three
I'm going to say it, Caesar > Alexander
Two died at the height of their power (with potential for more. One died an exiled broken bitch
Napoleon.
He was the Zelensky of his time
proof?
He was Italian like fauci
what does that have to do with anything
Manlets
is this some kind of american seethe post
zelensky hasn't done shit compared to napoleon
2 were lgbt while the other was a cuck.
all romans and greeks weren't gay
cut it out
the "master of Europe" anybody who beats all rivals on the continent
Charlemagne, Napoleon, Bismarck, Hitler etc.
Europe was warlike for a long time
it's alexander, napolean and hitler.
What historic archetype would that be? Caesar and Napoleon both subverted the system to become de jure kings, but Alexander WAS the system, seeing as he inherited his throne.
confident men swinging their dicks around and making history
Alexander, Napoleon, Genghis Khan, Hitler
Because you worship power
No I wish to become power
Same thing
Hitler was better than all of them combined and in 500 years he will be regarded with religious awe
no one likes germans
Tiny one-bollocked soulles Austrian is only revered by retards.
Napolean.
im gonna say it
caesar > napoleon > alexander
What makes ceasar greater than alexander
ceasar had more formidable foes and faced more internal adversity, had more cultural impact on modern day society, and his story is overall more comprehensive and interesting
Napoleon > Caesar > Alexander
Augustus > Alexander the """"""""""great""""""""""
Sargon of Akkad, Nebuchadnezzar, Cyrus the Great > these literal who's
Caesar: badass, still THE symbol of power, incredible aesthetic.
Alexander: educated by Aristotele, his life almost looks like a myth.
Napoleon: small empire, beaten on the battlefield, kitsch aesthetic, resents his origins, nouveau rich and it shows, we can see his sister titties paying a cheap ticket, being Napoleon is universally a cliché of being a lunatic segregated in an asylum
Who are some others like this? I want to read more books about people like this
I'm thinking I'll read about Frederick the Great and Gustavia Adolphus next because they're similar
The problem with Caesar is that he spent his whole life attaining power and when he finally got it, he dies within like 3 months. Alexander for me is the true kino. Led from the front, nonstop adventure. Died drinking