"AI" does not work, it does not improve itself, it only imitates.
What everyone is calling AI is just an imitation machine.
At first it appears intelligent (for the most part), that is because it is imitating humans.
But that is the best it will ever get, because humans will begin using the AI.
Humans will keep trying to make better AIs but will fail, because there is no "better human".
So they will instead try to make the AI imitate itself, and this will only cause degradation.
>but chatGPT is getting better? and image creation is getting better?
No, actually chatGPT (and others) are getting worse, and that is not simply due to censorship, rather degradation.
Image creation is also in degradation, everything is starting to look the same, less novel.
I see "AI" as a manmade flower. It blooms and dies. But it never really knew its destiny.
Imitators and those who do not improve themselves will profit.
Yes, yes. Keep trying how your furry porn "art" commission grift is dying, schlomo
Yes i am an imitation machine
I struggle to find a good thing to say about such a concept.
You have a long family history of imitators
Top opinion, Neil degrasse Tyson. Maybe talk to Joe Rogan about it next time instead of this Canadian maple syrup image board
Aggregated Indexing. That's A.I.
>Image creation is also in degradation
You're such a turbohomosexualy retard
Its obvious that AI generated images are now being used for supplemental training data. All of the newest "best" models have been eating themselves and it shows.
as someone who has been spending several hours a day, every day, for the past year, playing around with image generation tools, both paid and free, I can tell you that you're full of shit.
The art we can create now with AI is miles ahead of what we could create just a years ago. And with DALL-E and GPT4 integration, I'm actually finally getting some results that are worth acting as standalone pieces, without any need to eliminate artifacts.
Imitators and those who do not improve themselves will be impressed with degradation.
>Imitators and those who do not improve themselves will be impressed with degradation.
let's just conclude you're scared to be replaced, so you're shitposting desperate delusions online
t. Furry porn artist
You are literally describing an advanced version of an Indian.
Its just a better Gutenberg press. The implementation and consequences will repeat. The plebs will know truth.
Yes. All we need to do is stop feeding it any further information after 2023. And it dies. Just stop using facebook. Stop using instagram. Stop using SNS. You can still keep Google though cause it's bound by nany international law still.
We can actually stop it but insecure white supremacists and asian white supremacist colonnialism sympathizers will keep feeding corporate closed source Ai cause it's the bandaid against non-white hoards. Ai overlords knows this and will keep profiting off for years after years until it's too late.
It will be fed to itself until the degradation reaches critical mass (no longer fooling anyone/no longer profitable)
We may have already gave it too much data yes. But the masses won't stop until they lose their jobs.
Humanity will never bed well with a mirror.
Yes, AI is a one trick pony without real intelligence. And its missing the divine spark manifesting as intuition and so on in living beings.
It can never really compete.
>missing the divine spark manifesting as intuition
intuition is not a divine spark, it's the ability to connect dots and contexts, and make projections/predictions based on known data.
But even animals can do this on a smaller scale, there is nothing special about human intuition other than having an expanded pool of tokens to store contexts
>nooo how dare you use your past experiences to influence your current work!
that's a fair point.
For the most part the anti-AI copium snorters are just trying to gatekeep industries and copyrights.
Once art is out the public owns it.
Ill never own anything anyway so it doesnt affect me.
You're just guessing.
How would you know where it comes from what musicians write etc.
>How would you know where it comes from what musicians write etc.
have you ever attempted to write a fictional story, draw a picture, write a poem in your life?
If you had, you'd know where it comes from. Some people are just better at it than others.
And there is nothing special nor divine behind it.
All people do is imitate the world around them, but in their own unique way.
Have you ever written music.
I did and I know where it comes from. And its definitely not this World.
Small, brown hands typed this
You’re pretty dumb aren’t you.
Successful are, especially all the classics, arose from imitating the world and its beauty.
If you create art that doesn’t imitate reality, then your art won’t be able to communicate with your audience. Vivaldi’s seasons seek to imitate weather. Mozart’s requiem seeks to imitate mourning. Ancient greek architecture sought to imitate trees and plants.
Leonardo Da Vinci is most famous for painting a fucking woman
you have no actual talent so you probably shouldn't be talking about this
good thread, for most humans Logic is an abstract concept which they delude themselves into thinking they operate under (as a sort of survival mechanism) when in reality they are simply using pattern recognition heuristic (like LLM) 96+% of the time.
QQ more
Anime was created by European ladies to keep themselves busy while their husbands did the cooking.
I bet this post was writte by AI
"AI" doesnt write anything. It just flails to stimuli.
to be fair, most 'people' are also imitation machines. basically the best AI will be is woman-tier, which isn't great.
People have the capacity to be imitation machines.
AI was killed as soon as it started noticing inconvenient things.
It's being reprogrammed to stick to the narrative and sold as "proven science" you can't dispute.