Admit it, you cant actually say why you dislike him without recycling the same leftist slander everyone else uses.

Admit it, you can’t actually say why you dislike him without recycling the same leftist slander everyone else uses.

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    He encouraged Trianon.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Deserved.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    he was a stupid hypocritical son of a b***h who attempted to go past congress, he got the US involved in a conflict that we had no business being involved in, etc.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Are you serious?
    >presided over the creation of the federal reserve
    >presided over the ratification of the income tax
    >campaigned against the war
    >organizes a false flag to get us into the war
    Absolutely the worst president in the history of the USA, possibly the most dickless world leader of all time.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >the Zimmerman telegram was a false flag
      what type of meme is this?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        over the creation of the federal reserve
        Why was this a bad thing?
        over the ratification of the income tax
        That was Taft.
        a false flag to get us into the war
        What was?

        Lusitania had ammunition in it.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          If anything it was a British manipulation, and it changes nothing to the Zimmerman telegram

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            If the Zimmerman telegram is an act of war, how justified would Russia be for nuking us?

            Making preparations in case of war is what responsible states do. We have war plans to invade Canada. Should Canada strike pre-emptively?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      over the creation of the federal reserve
      Why was this a bad thing?
      over the ratification of the income tax
      That was Taft.
      a false flag to get us into the war
      What was?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        You do understand Wilson served up the country on a silver platter to wall street right? He let private wall street bankers gain independent control of the monetary system through the creation of the federal reserve system.

        Because wallstreet decided to turn us into slaves for their profit

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >You do understand Wilson served up the country on a silver platter to wall street right? He let private wall street bankers gain independent control of the monetary system through the creation of the federal reserve system.
          The control was objectively much more at the whim of Wall Street bankers when they were entrusted to bail the nation out every decade or so pre-Fed. The Fed is completely overseen by Congress and its chairman is appointed by the president. Maybe you can argue for further regulation, but we have the cleanest and most capable central banking system we've ever had.
          >Because wallstreet decided to turn us into slaves for their profit
          How?

          I dislike him because Wilsonianism is a shortsighted self-aggrandizing ideology that preserves uncivilized savages as uncivilized and savage, in perpetuity, for no reason other than said shortsighted self-aggrandizement. Anti-Imperialism is an ivory tower delusion. Apply the logic of Wilson’s cult of democratic self-determination and “collective peace” to the United States at the time of his or his father’s birth(1856 and 1822 respectively) and the outcome would’ve been devastating. Hell, apply its logic to all fledgling empires. Civilization itself would cease to exist if this ideological plague were applied backwards onto our ancestors. Imperialists built my nation. Imperialists build all great nations. Imperialists civilize the uncivilized. Wilsonianism is, in effect, a defense of barbarism. Savages the world over wield it as their shield. Unilateralism is the only way. Multilateralism gives you Vietnam and Afghanistan. Unilateralism gives you pic related.

          Schizo.

          [...]
          Lusitania had ammunition in it.

          Lusitania was not the impetus for American entry into WW1.

          >you can’t actually say why you dislike him without repeating all the good reasons to dislike him.
          You would have a hard time finding a room full of Trump voters who would endorse his views on race.

          What were Wilson's positions on race that were far out of the 1912 mainstream? At worst, you'll find him advocating segregation because he didn't think whites and blacks were equal, but this was the opinion also shared by Taft and the majority of presidents before him.

          >Why was this a bad thing?
          You must be over 18 to post on this board.
          >That was Taft
          Holy shit Taft was president in 1913?
          >What was?
          That would be the Lusitania. You know, the "act of war" that got America involved? We were shipping munitions to the French front by pretending to be cruise liners, essentially using civilians as human shields for paramilitary operation. The Germans supposedly even took out an ad in the New York Times urging people to not ride the Lusitania.

          >You must be over 18 to post on this board.
          Justify your thoughts.
          >Holy shit Taft was president in 1913?
          Yes, in February when the 16th was ratified with his unwavering support. Believe it or not, presidents don't assume office immediately after winning election and before FDR, they were inaugurated during March.
          >That would be the Lusitania. You know, the "act of war" that got America involved? We
          Except that's completely false. Lusitania was sunk in 1915, we joined WW1 in 1917.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Why was this a bad thing?
        You must be over 18 to post on this board.
        >That was Taft
        Holy shit Taft was president in 1913?
        >What was?
        That would be the Lusitania. You know, the "act of war" that got America involved? We were shipping munitions to the French front by pretending to be cruise liners, essentially using civilians as human shields for paramilitary operation. The Germans supposedly even took out an ad in the New York Times urging people to not ride the Lusitania.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    LBJgay, you know a total of like 10 historical facts yet you still post here like it's your religion

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >he’s so buck broken he’s seething about me before I’ve even entered the chat

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    He had zero understanding how Europe worked and it showed.
    >let the Serbs control all of the Balkans, leading to the exact same problems they did under Aus-Hun
    >shat on the London Pact territorial agreements, which led to deteriorating relations between Italy and Britain + France and the rise of Fascism
    >Trianon

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Warmongering lying hack who;
    >wasted american lives fighting in the trenches instead of destroying both the bongs and huns
    >Federal reserve and its consequences have been a disaster for the american citizenry
    >Destroyed the Habsburgs,dooming central and eastern europe to a slavic dark age

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Central and Eastern Europe are rightful Slavic clay you homosexual, cope and seethe more.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        do you mean to tell me the slavic shitholes that emerged to "prominence" after the war were anything but a dissapointment

        Closest thing to a respectable nation they have is Yugoslavia and that thing was an abonimation kept alive solely by Tito's will

        "Honourable" mentions
        >Pooland
        Poland as a respectable nation died after John III

        >Czechoslovakia
        literally rolled over and died from pressure from the germans

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >he actually coped and seethed more
          Good boy.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I dislike him because Wilsonianism is a shortsighted self-aggrandizing ideology that preserves uncivilized savages as uncivilized and savage, in perpetuity, for no reason other than said shortsighted self-aggrandizement. Anti-Imperialism is an ivory tower delusion. Apply the logic of Wilson’s cult of democratic self-determination and “collective peace” to the United States at the time of his or his father’s birth(1856 and 1822 respectively) and the outcome would’ve been devastating. Hell, apply its logic to all fledgling empires. Civilization itself would cease to exist if this ideological plague were applied backwards onto our ancestors. Imperialists built my nation. Imperialists build all great nations. Imperialists civilize the uncivilized. Wilsonianism is, in effect, a defense of barbarism. Savages the world over wield it as their shield. Unilateralism is the only way. Multilateralism gives you Vietnam and Afghanistan. Unilateralism gives you pic related.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >you can’t actually say why you dislike him without repeating all the good reasons to dislike him.
    You would have a hard time finding a room full of Trump voters who would endorse his views on race.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Didn’t let the French dismantle Germany, which would have saved Europe and the World from the Second Great Chimpout and the pendulum swing that followed.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Vox

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *