According to LULZ:
>WHG --> swarthy, dark hair, blue eyes
>EEF --> basically middle easteners, dark hair/eyes
>Yamnaya --> dark everything, basically indians
>modern Europeans who are a mixture of these --> white skin with a lot of light eyed/haired individuals
makes perfect sense
according to (invented strawman)
oy vey shut this thread down.
your butts sure are hurt :DD
what you mean? i'm postin genetically accurate reconstructions
butthurt irony :DD
>:DD
Kek, could you make your seething any more obvious?
youre the one being combative 😀
>this is wrong, because I hate naggers
unironically my earnest belief
It doesn't matter because Europeans are almost 100% Neanderthal. None of these whatevers ever existed.
totally correct reconstruction of Scandinavian hunter gatherer
made by Abu Prajesh Edelstein. source: just trust me bro™
Corded ware reconstruction (found in Hildesheim grave, Germany)
Nordic HGs were white, both the men and women were successful at passing on their genes. Nordic HG Y-DNA is still common.
No and no.
A large minority of Scandinavian men still carry pre-IE Y-DNA
It doesn't mean it came from Scandinavian HGs. Most Scandinavian HGs and farmers carried I2, minority R1b-V88 and some even Q. There's one pre-I1 in Scandinavia. Less than Q.
Nordic HGs like I1 are as common as steppe/Aryan HGs like R1a/R1b in India
helo sir show bobs and vagena
>swarthy
Swarthy is within the range of Europeans today. They weren't swarthy, they were brown to dark brown.
>They weren't swarthy, they were brown to dark brow
How do you know this?
I don't. I just know it'll make you asshurt to insinuate that your ancestors were the color you hate.
Completely true, modern Europeans are descended from ancient alien Gods from Pleiades.
This unironically except they weren't aliens or gods and came from Atlantis.
this is all correct except proto-CWC and Anatolians would both be slightly lighter (and probably variation in features).
Europeans who are a mixture of these --> white skin with a lot of light eyed/haired individuals
>makes perfect sense
Yes because modern northern europeans are lighter than BA europeans because of selection. Just because in the BA they have alleles for light features doesn't mean it is common or most likely to be expressed.
Whg had dark eyes
None of these are the ancestors of white people
selection happened since the iron age in the north dumdum
and not before. although some farmer groups had a lot of blue eyed and blond haired individuals
iberian farmers even had some redheads
All of this shit is based on a model that can't even predict modern pigmentation.
>source: trust me bro
>Self-reported skin color data showed that 363 people claimed to be white, 170 brown, 51 black, while 27 claimed to be yellow. Regarding self-reported eye color, 77 individuals self-declared with blue eyes, 121 with intermediate eyes (green/hazel) and 405 with brown eyes. Considering hair color, self-reported data showed 63 people with black hair, 488 with brown hair, 49 blond hair and 11 reported to have red hair.
Prediction results were obtained from HIrisPlex-S algorithm, regarding eye color, hair color and skin color. From these results, we calculated AUC values for each of the characteristics, demonstrating their prediction performance for our admixed population.
>AUC values (Table 1) obtained for the prediction model analyzed were significant for blue eyes (0.88), brown eyes (0.67), black hair (0.67), light skin (0.72) and dark skin. (0.64). Intermediate eye and skin colors did not obtain satisfactory prediction values compared to those of the extreme phenotypes (light/dark), as also observed in the HIrisPlex-S model studies.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875176819301465
the supposed quote is not in the Brazilian study
cope and seethe
>For skin color the correct prediction rate was 95% for light skin, 10% for intermediate skin and 13.3% for dark skin.
So they can't actually predict dark skin.
The quote is from here:
>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875176819301507
>Regarding its forensic applicability in Brazil, the accuracy rate of 19.16% for combined prediction of eye, hair and skin pigmentation discloses the HIrisPlex-S failure in predicting intermediate phenotypes, which limits its usefulness not only in Brazil, but also in other countries with a similar history of recent admixture between continental groups.
>Unfortunately, results for skin color prediction using the HIrisPlex-S system in our Brazilian sample were in general not satisfactory. The major cause of this failure is possibly related to other factors that can influence pigmentary phenotypes in admixed populations, such as the existence of pigmentation SNPs not included in the system and the occurrence of epistatic interactions different from those that occur in Europeans
>Muh dark skin variant
there's no study for it for humans and it does not do what the blog you copied this claims
>MFSD12 is highly expressed in melanocytes, the cells that produce melanin. To verify the gene’s role in contributing to skin pigmentation, the researchers blocked expression of the gene in cells in culture and found an increase in production of eumelanin, the pigment type responsible for black and brown skin, hair and eye color. Knocking out the gene in zebrafish caused a loss of cells that produce yellow pigment. And in mice, knocking out the gene changed the color of their coat from agouti, caused by hairs with a red and yellow pigment, to a uniform gray by eliminating production of pheomelanin, a type of pigment also found in humans.
according to those predictions on skin color, yakut people should be african-tier black. the tarim mummies should've been african-tier black too. it's just a fucking meme
--> dark everything, basically indians
Which Indians? There are other populations who have dark hair, dark eyes, and swarthy skin, you know. Why don't people compare them to Afghans or something?
>WHG --> dark skin, dark brown hair, blue eyes
>EEF --> light skin, light brown hair, blue eyes
>Yamnaya --> intermediate skin, black hair, brown eyes
>>EEF --> basically middle easteners, dark hair/eyes
What the fuck are you talking about? Middle Easterners are a fairly new thing.
--> dark everything, basically indians
Indians are heavily Dravidian so no to this too.
>Indians are heavily Dravidian so no to this too.
Dravidians are basically dark skinned caucasoids, in fact proto caucasoids evolved in South Asia and spread northward into siberia like 40kya or a bit later. Indian tribals are usually haplogroups F or H which are considered to be the second wave of humans out of Africa and into Eurasia. F was once widespread across Europe but isn't anymore.
Tinyuan man and Malta boy have substantial South Asian ancestry, less than 50% but still a surprising amount.
>EEF --> basically middle easteners, dark hair/eyes
nope