ABRAMS ARE COMING TO UKRAINE


Warning: Attempt to read property "comment_date" on null in /var/www/wptbox/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1043

Warning: Attempt to read property "comment_date" on null in /var/www/wptbox/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1043

Warning: Attempt to read property "comment_date" on null in /var/www/wptbox/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1043
  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    trust israelitetin's plan. don't listen to igor strelkov.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    french tanks are the best, look that beast

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      do they even have spare tires? what happens when they lose front and back wheels? so many questions, but not many answers

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        for many applications the wheels are the better option and the changes certainly are easier than fixing a fuck up track

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You can get 10 of these from 1 Abrams' price.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It looks like a hunchbacked dwarf-btr and a flipped frying pan gave birth to this thing

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That nigga be mighty cute

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    good.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      fucking kek

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        dat boy be cookin

        pffffff pathetic, can't wait to see new batch of webms of these useless toys being btfo

        You retarded homosexuals do realize that blowout panels are why m1 abrams crews survive a vast majority of the time right? Or would you rather be sitting on top of an exposed ammo carousel?

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          I realize that you're a homosexual, how bout that??

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      dat boy be cookin

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      pffffff pathetic, can't wait to see new batch of webms of these useless toys being btfo

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Not immune from the front either it seems

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Jesus Christ

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Not immune from the front either it seems

      cook off is meant to happen retards. The tank is getting destroyed, but at least the crew survives. Can't say the same for soviet tanks

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >cook off is meant to happen
        I believe what's supposed to happen is that the turret frontal armor doesn't get penetrated in the first place, and if it does, it's not supposed to ignite the ammunition. A controlled cook off is of course the third best option.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          you are not even supposed to get hit thats the first point

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >the tank getting blown up is INTENTIONAL guise

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          you’re retarded

          It’s not supposed to save the tank but the crew, unlike the russian tankers american ones aren’t known for their high altitude flights

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        So did the zogbots in the tank survive?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >tank gets hit from the front
        >goes all the way through to ammo hold
        >instantly incinerates all crew members inside
        >I-I-ITS S-S-S-S-UPOSED T-TO DO T-THAT!!

        No, it's not. It's supposed to cook off in the event it is hit from the side or back with a missile, like the first video, not in the front. If the ammo cooked off from a frontal attack, the entire crew is dead as the firewall was penetrated.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      kino

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Not immune from the front either it seems

      No surprise. The Abrams is a shit tank that didn't even succeed fighting against sand naggers and goat herders in the middle east. Against a well prepared, modernised army, like Russia's? Where the T-90 is more modern, faster, and has a better main cannon? It's going to tear through ukrops inside like a hot knife through butter, and Americans are still going to pretend that no Abrams has ever been destroyed, despite it happening repeatedly

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >Abrams is a shit tank
        I wouldn't say shit tank as much as gas guzzler.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        kek
        abrams is literally on a point and click adventure against t-62s and t-72s, which is all russia uses now

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        I don't think neither the Challenger, Abrams, Leopards or whatever has the strength to help Ukraine. Javelins, Himars, Baykar did nothing but decelerate their suffering. They are in their what? 7-8 mobilization by now? Who is working in industries? Not good.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Let’s go full retard

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    9th game changing wunderwaffen incoming while Ukraine conscripts more teenagers at gunpoint lets go putler is finished for real this time

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The potentially gamechanging aspect is the quantity. The US has, at least on paper, over 5500 Abrams.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It is going to be SO FUNNY to watch the M1 Abrams getting blown to bits because it can't idle.....so the Zelensky-forces won't be able to ambush with them. They will either sit and be blown to pieces, or they will be on the move...blown to pieces.

    Oh...and the M1 has a horrific maintenance requirement that the 'good goys' won't keep up with. So I'm sure Russia will end up with abandoned M1s.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I assume they are only doing this to make Germany look bad and buckle under public pressure. I haven't read any releases from today, but recently the US administration has been hammering on the point that the Abrams will not be ready for combat for months, and require extensive training, while mentioning that they are already familiar with the Leopards that are so close by. So I bet US is doing what we call here up north a "dirty dangle"

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >it can’t idle
      Wait what

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It can idle, but it uses triple the fuel in idle compared to what it burns running at full speed. He is being hyperbolic, but there is some truth to it.

        Also idling is horrific on the engine and it is already a piece of shit so as soon as they start breaking down the hohols will just abandon them on the field.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >It can idle, but it uses triple the fuel in idle compared to what it burns running at full speed. He is being hyperbolic, but there is some truth to it.

          Modern abramses have a box at the rear, it contains a generator so the tank can sit and camp with all electronics on and engine off. A turbine doesnt have the starting problems that a piston engine can have.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's got 2vidke speeds "normal" at 750 RPM and tactical at 1300. Normal idle means that it has to spin up to run. Tactical means that it can run immediately. I would think that they only run tactical for like a couple of hours at a time when they are expecting combat

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      they will just be behind lines and used for the next major counter offensive.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This. Looking forward to all the webm's of exploding abrams. The US of all countries should know that tanks are nothing without proper air support, which Ukraine has absolutely none of.

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I think this is all the provocation that Russia needs, hopefully they start nuking shit.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Wait has the abrams been used in any tank on tank warfare yet?
    Our government is fucking stupid but would they really let the vulnerabilities of the abrams be exposed in this gay war?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Anon i...

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        is he ok?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Note the flag. All the desert rats who could fight got wiped out in Desert Storm 1 and 2.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      they have been blown up many times in iraq and afghanistan
      china, russia and iran are said to have acquired destroyed tanks also

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'm talking about the possibility of them engaging with other current generation tanks though

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          ah yes I see what you mean, but I was responding to this bit
          >let the vulnerabilities of the abrams be exposed
          I think it's enough to study the remains of a destroyed abrams. I could be wrong though

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            that's definitely part of it
            seeing how it actually handles different types of engagements is important too

            >current generation tanks
            You mean the T80 or the T90 which are both from the 1980’s?

            my bad I thought there was something newer

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >current generation tanks
          You mean the T80 or the T90 which are both from the 1980’s?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Viperion

      Suicide drone the engine and optics, and it's a 65 ton paperweight. Are Russian speaking Ukrainians going to be able to handle English computerized equipment that is vastly different and more complicated than T72's...

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Are Russian speaking Ukrainians going to be able to handle English computerized equipment that is vastly different and more complicated than T72's...
        Well, a lot of Europeans can speak English, so there's that

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >mfw M1s will have to be manned by Ukrainian camwhores used to flirting in English on the computer all day

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It was built with the average mutt zogbot in mind so everything is dumbed down.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It was used to destroy Russian tanks during the Gulf war.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >shitty russian export models manned by primate tier IQ shitskins

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          And now will go against slightly less shitty domestic models with shitty or no maintenance manned by primate tier IQ ruskies

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Best Iraqi tank was just the T-72M1 though. Tanks used by the Russians could potentially be much more difficult opponents.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The T80 which is the most common Russian tank in service is only a slight upgrade though.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I think the common Russian tank is various T-72B variants. And I think even the basic T-80B is better than the T-72M1, for example integrated ATGM.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >/po/naggers who are the most loudest about the war has no fucking clue about the things they scream about
      >implies Abrams has not been in any tank vs tank confrontation
      >also threads making fun of Bradly’s
      >what was the Gulf War
      >Medina Ridge
      >73 Easting
      I hope naggers and spics rape your mothers, holy fuck is /misc/ completely buck broken by Russian shills.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Don't bother. Everyone on here is a military expert when they want to be. They know nothing.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        yeah I could have sworn that abrams fucking bodied the iraqis as soon as air dominance had been secured

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        and it will still get destroyed by atgms before it even gets to battle. cope k cuck go eat some cum brownies again

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >what was the Gulf War
        >Medina Ridge
        >73 Easting
        It will be interesting to see them used aginst an opponent with Kornet, Bastion, Ataka, Vikhr, T-72B3M, T-90M, etc, and ubiquitous drone and artillery support

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >a bunch of shit from 30 years ago
        Lmao loser I bet you still think FLIR is "cutting edge" lololol

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Oh yea dude because t72s are so cutting edge too lmao get a grip fucking retard.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Wait has the abrams been used in any tank on tank warfare yet?
      no but Toyota vs tank war Toyota won.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        The Toyota truck is the real work horse of modern warfare.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          C-can I make one from my corolla?

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They are not getting peak Iraq war Abrams with explosive reactive armor and all that shit. They will be vanilla gulf war shit that has been stripped of everything other than the main armaments

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Looks like they are being sent just the original M1s which we haven't used since the mid 80s, in the Gulf War we fielded M1A1s

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        But why though?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Looks like they are being sent just the original M1s which we haven't used since the mid 80s, in the Gulf War we fielded M1A1s

        If they cant tank russian long range AT missiles they will do no better than T-72s.

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Necessary we need to phase out the Abrams and like the A-10 I don't think that's going to happen until we see it was really only helpful for killing sandnaggers cheap. Better it happens to ukranian crews now than American ones when it matters.

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Pls no.
    Hohols are going to drive them one at a time into empty fields like retards where they’ll be drone fodder and /misc/ is gonna spam the webms, make it stop…

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >send in the Avrahams goyim

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    These tank threads should be moved to /k/.

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    NATO GLOVES ARE COMING OFF

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm sure the DPR boys will have fun with their new toys

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Misc predicted many years ago nato was planning an illegal ground war in belarus and tanks would be the way. Misc is always right.

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Whose actually saying they are a supertank? All I'm seeing is Z bros saying they aren't. They are a hell of a lot better than any of the Soviet shit. I'd rather 1 of these than 3 of those clangers that have seen the afghan war. Will probably be game changers if they can get enough massed.

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    there wont be just m1, there will be a load of other tanks and theyre going to send nato troops. this is literally ww3 retards and you sit here laughing.
    fuck you idiots

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    you wont be laughing when you get drafted to eat cruise missiles you pussies

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      there wont be just m1, there will be a load of other tanks and theyre going to send nato troops. this is literally ww3 retards and you sit here laughing.
      fuck you idiots

      >nato troops
      source?? if i get drafted i will flee to russia, fuck this shithole EU continent

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >i will flee to russia
        >gets drafted into Russian army instead
        Retard.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You will get drafted by Russia then you retard.

          why would russia draft foreigners?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Mine clearing

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You will get drafted by Russia then you retard.

  22. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >70-ton abomination with known massive logistical demands
    >sent in for updoots

  23. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Well how Oryx will count abrams as russian lose now?

  24. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    M1A?
    Lmao RPG-29s have been pushing right through that steel armor for over a decade now...

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No they haven't you fucking retard. Export models do not have depleted uranium armor. Stop pulling baseless shit out your ass.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah which is why we saw plenty of steel armor M1s getting btfo by sandnaggers for like 20 years now lmao.
        The new shit is RPG-32s but keep thinking they're still running around with PPSH and RPG-7s like Cawadooty you clown.

  25. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >people familiar with the matter said
    nothing ever happens
    sage

  26. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    imagine putting a jet engine in a tank

  27. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    The logistical maze of all the different parts for all this hodgepodge of materiel will surely be no biggie for hohol grandpas with Parkinson's from the n+1st pressganging wave to navigate.

  28. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Oh nice, the hummer of the tanks. Likely only the 10% is usable. I think to reach Moscow they need a truck convoy with oil tanks behind lol. Wait, wait, WW1 trenches war is over and we will have panzer war again in the spring?
    2024 what? When the tactical nukes?

  29. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    lol. these shitty tanks are falling apart in the desert, now imagine them in a frozen swamp.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *