you better hope they can put your brain in a jar and plug it into horrors beyond human comprehension or do so after growing your clone in a lab from a strand of hair
>I can't help but admire the psychopath that's looking to take everything I have, including my life
I mean, you should have a reasoned respect for the hurricane, but I wouldn't admire it.
I'm aware this could be the abyss looking back at me, but I think they're testing us on some Darwinian "survival of the fittest" type stuff. They still allow us to read and listen to what they all believe and think, so when they tell us to "maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature," I listen and prepare for a time when I may have to prove my spot on the boat or wherever the 500 million people are going. Maybe it's transhumanism-based, like the singularity.
I think that's part of it. But they don't want the ones remaining to be free. They apparently want to control like biological machines.
No ownership, no autonomy, no freedom, just your emotions and thoughts monitored and controlled by their AIs.
Make no mistake anon, these people are utter lunatics. They aren't idiots, but they are certainly crazy.
You can also see a mass kill off coming. They don't target individuals. It's usually a large wave of death, by accident or otherwise. 6,881,718 people have died so far from the coronavirus COVID-19 outbreak as of May 24, 2023. Then, to clean up their "mess", they release a vaccine. The estimated human cost of the COVID-19 vaccines is 26.6 million injuries, 1.36 million disabilities, and 300,000 excess deaths. Allegedly.
It's biosafety-related. That lab may have specific practices, safety equipment, and specially designed buildings to ensure that workers, the community, and the environment are protected from accidental exposure or unintentional release of infectious agents, toxins, and other biological hazards.
"Airborne transmissible diseases like COVID-19 are typically categorized as Biosafety Level 3 (BSL-3). BSL-3 laboratories are almost always purpose-constructed containment laboratories, outfitted with specialized equipment and HVAC systems designed to ensure no airborne particles can exit the contained space." - Consolidated Sterilizer Systems
The CDC must've placed COVID-19 next to Anthrax on the biosafety clearance level. Even if it's not as bad as anthrax, the workers in the lab don't make the calls. They have to put the suits on in order to enter the lab and do their job.
Or that image could've been another Bilderberg psyop to make COVID-19 look like a BSL-4. The Wall Street Journal is owned by Rupert Murdoch, who was a participant in the 1988 Bilderberg Meeting.
Like an apiarist (Satan) and a beehive (the pawns). Shout out to my Bible thumpers. Love ya'll.
I think the technocrats are trying to prevent another Ozymandias situation:
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal Wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away.”
The ideology is what's being built this time around instead of bricks and mortar. Like an ideological Tower of Babel.
Technocrats and old money, to whom you'd be referring, don't mix well. Old money is interested in keeping things as they are or were, which is the opposite of what technocrats want. The only technocrats that I know who were also old money would be David Rockefeller and Evelyn de Rothschild, who both attended Bilderberg Group meetings. The rest of the technocrats are relatively new money in comparison. For example, Elon Musk, Bill Clinton, Al Gore and Anthony Fauci got rich later in life. They were born upper-middle-class at best. Musk's dad got rich in the 1980s when Elon was a teen.
Adding on:
I don't count Beatrix of the Netherlands who's on the chart because most royals just go to be seen. A technocracy goes against everything royals stand for.
This web is much more than just money. It's showing the organized cooperation between corporations, think tanks, banks, the government, the media, and educational institutions toward a technocratic common goal.
To add on: A technocracy is a government run by experts, which I assume most of this board would be into if Elon or someone like that were part of it. A one-world government run by experts, basically. If you're a crypto guy, imagine Vitalik Buterin, Charles Hoskinson and Elon Musk running your country instead of who we have now. See? Not so bad.
This web is much more than just money. It's showing the organized cooperation between corporations, think tanks, banks, the government, the media, and educational institutions toward a technocratic common goal.
the gods of the valleys
are not
The Gods of the Hills
I'm using Elon as an example to help make you guys more comfortable with the idea of technocratic rule over what we have now. If you don't like Elon, pick another technocrat. I'd happily be ruled by Linus Torvalds and the like because he's a genius who's actually down to earth.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Humans were never meant to have that level of power over others. They will inevitably be tyrants, not necessarily because they're bad people (though most that seek control over others are), but because the system demands it.
I always forget Libertarianism is the main ideology of this board. I'd love to see it in action on a large scale. I'm just mentally preparing for the most authoritarian governmental progression.
6 days ago
Anonymous
Libertarianism doesn't work if it doesn't contain mechanisms to prevent the concentrations of power.
Power works much like biological succession. You slash and burn a forest and you get the primary colonizers taking root here and there. They modify the environment in their own way and eventually give way to higher level succession, ending up with the domination of larger plants that block out the sun and use their phytochemical warfare to suppress smaller upstarts.
6 days ago
Anonymous
So something like egalitarian libertarianism, which stresses both individual freedom and social equality.
6 days ago
Anonymous
I dunno really. I think the key lies in the primacy of local power/sovereignty, where local communities can effectively reject anything that the state or federal government wants to push on them. Not sure how that would work in practice though.
>Libertarianism doesn't work if it doesn't contain mechanisms to prevent the concentrations of power.
Yeah, that's call laissez-faire capitalism
You aren't one of those dimwits who thinks that more government = less monopolies right ?
Yea I know that centers of non-governmental power infect governments to force regulations to their advantage. That's obviously a huge reason why things are so shit right now.
How would you prevent the growth of centralized power in an environment where centralized power has an inherent advantage?
6 days ago
Anonymous
>How would you prevent the growth of centralized power in an environment where centralized power has an inherent advantage?
Not that anon but it is typically the introduction of regulation and taxes allow power to be centralized in the first place. I don't believe a business, nor a specific product or service could actually be so good and also impossible to replicate that it would stand a chance to maintain a large market share without state intervention.
6 days ago
Anonymous
>Libertarianism doesn't work if it doesn't contain mechanisms to prevent the concentrations of power.
Yeah, that's call laissez-faire capitalism
You aren't one of those dimwits who thinks that more government = less monopolies right ?
5 days ago
Anonymous
>Libertarianism doesn't work if it doesn't contain mechanisms to prevent the concentrations of power.
We already tried that, it only gave the government more power and made things worse.
Could you please explain to me the meaning of the word "meant" in the context of human evolution. Thank you.
6 days ago
Anonymous
You can take it in the sense that humans have innate desires to control and dominate their environment. These desires are kept in check by the fact that it's difficult to do so. If you give a person absolute, godlike powers, the checks dissolve and the person is free to engage in limitless domination and control. They also can't oversee what effects their powerful actions, actions that affect millions of people will really have on a granular level, and their psychological defense mechanisms will lead him to dismiss and demonize those who complain that his actions are causing them to suffer.
It's basically just the same sort of thing as taking people who evolved to crave sugar in sugar poor environments and putting them in the world's largest chocolate factory.
You evolve for a particular range of environments, when you're put in a drastically different environment, some of your physiological or physiological mechanisms can become pathological.
6 days ago
Anonymous
Great explanation. Now to propose a counter argument: existence is not static. Sugar has killed and will continue to kill all those who can't adapt to the new meta. It's just the way it is. Perhaps one day humans will evolve to be capable of wielding power. A lot of creatures will perish in the process, but that's just the way the system operates.
6 days ago
Anonymous
Yes but what evolutionary mechanism prevents the would be tyrant from being a tyrant? Unless every tyrant is killed to weed out the psychological mechanisms, making them unable to persist in the genes of the population, you'll continue to have tyrants.
6 days ago
Anonymous
Yes, but why is that a problem? Do you mourn the sugar victims?
6 days ago
Anonymous
Nobody actually has godlike powers so in the real world, there are always limits to domination and control.
What changes is technology. This time around, the powers of surveillance, data processing and weaponry and other mechanisms of control are many orders of magnitude beyond anything that even the tyrants of the last century had.
You should fear the sugar eaters because you are the sugar.
6 days ago
Anonymous
Fear is the mind killer, fren. You telling me I should fear the inevitable, how is that going to help? This is the way the world works. I choose to accept it.
6 days ago
Anonymous
More like, be wary of them and what they want. They seek to dominate and control you.
I don't think it's inevitable though by any stretch. We're seeing a massive bubble in the tyranny market and it's going to burst sooner or later. You're far better off living your life and improving your own local world than worrying about what narcissistic psychopaths in high places are doing.
6 days ago
Anonymous
>Sugar has killed and will continue to kill all those who can't adapt to the new meta
Que?
6 days ago
Anonymous
There's only one who is capable of wielding power and that is God.
Absolute power is the end result of consolidation of power. Technological innovation ensures one or few will one day control all, far further than they do now. I would prefer a benevolent tyrant over an insidious one. Free societies --in its true interpretation as opposed to a literal interpretation-- will be a thing of the past going forward, that is reality.
6 days ago
Anonymous
> Technological innovation ensures one or few will one day control all
I don't agree, though you MAY be right in the end. It's really a war between mechanisms that make centralized power more formidable vs decentralized power.
For example, the printing press decentralized knowledge (a conduit of power) and lead to the enlightenment among other things.
Or cannons destroyed the centralized power of stone fortifications. Or crossbows decentralized power by drastically reducing the barrier of entry to killing a knit (vs longbows, which took a lot more training). Then guns completely flipped the board (which is why they're SO obsessed with taking guns away).
Another example is the death of the battleship vs planes. Little entities of decentralized power overcame the big, 50,000 tones of centralized power.
Technology can swing this balance one way or the other. If you want to be free, you have to help develop technology that enables the decentralization of power.
6 days ago
Anonymous
Very well said. Even such things as Airbnb, where decentralised hosts competes strongly against large traditional hotel chains. Pareto law I suppose
this is very outdated. it probably hasnt changed that much, but it has definitely changed, that image is like 15 years old and I've never seen an updated one
It's sad that the majority of people still think we live in a free market or that capitalism is a good thing. This image alone is at the core capitalism not completely different from communism. I guess the biggest difference is at least with communism it's in your face capital it's like unless you're aware of this image and understand it people will continue to think McDonalds and burger king are owned by two different ceos that run only their company and are trying to compete for your attention when it's all one big fucking lie.
Huge difference between this and communism. You may not be able to get hand selected as CEO of a huge corporation, but you can still be a small time big timer and make it in business. You’re not destined to be garbage man #6043 for the rest of your life. At least there’s a sandbox game to play in this system. Communism is completely on rails.
Sorry I should have also stated I hate both systems capital and communism I see it as the same coin just different methods of taking power. I rather support local businesses.
True. I was surprised to read that small businesses generate 44% of U.S. economic activity (GDP). 33.2 million small businesses exist across the US, and only 2% of those small businesses have between 20 and 499 employees. So if you don't think about this big-picture stuff, you could do just fine in this country. I know a lot of small-town dwellers who don't have a clue about that image or even what LULZ is, but they're way more successful than me.
They do get bamboozled by psyops, though. This image shows us who creates and pushes these psyops that hurt, kill, or displace innocent people.
Anthony Fauci, a technocrat, ruled the US for a few years and it was hell. That's why I'd rather be ruled by a benevolent technocrat like Elon or Linus. Guys who are experts in tech instead of medicine.
Examples of insidious cooperation:
"McDonald's is partnering with the White House to promote coronavirus vaccine information on its coffee cups" - US News & World Report
This triggers copycat marketing campaigns by private companies: "Krispy Kreme will offer every American who has received at least one vaccination shot TWO free doughnuts any time every day Aug. 30 through Sept. 5." - CNBC
Or bipolar disorder, like Carrie Mathison from Homeland (a great show). The manic phase before the depression seems to give you enviable energy levels.
That's incredible software. I've always been amazed at the thought of someone creating this from scratch. I used to have that graph as a wallpaper years ago.
Adding on:
This one god-like entity to rule us all is the goal, but tyrant (a cruel and oppressive ruler) or paragon (a being viewed as a model of excellence), who knows what this ruler will choose. Ray Kurzweil thinks paragon, Max Tegmark thinks tyrant.
I think tyrant is far more realistic, but he will think he's a paragon.
heres why it is inevitable >having other people with power is a direct threat or hindrance to your power >having everyone else be enslaved and powerless ensures you will never have to fear your position
theyll use AI and gene editing to create the perfect slaves, whilst cannibalizing themselves till just one remains.
I know it sounds crazy at first but if you study history its basically certain.
Wouldn't transhumanism trigger a mass human ego death, which is a complete loss of subjective self-identity, removing the "person" all together?
No longer "he", "I", "your", just "we", "our", "us", etc.
We'd become like the Borg, I think. The Borg are cybernetic organisms (cyborgs) linked in a hive mind called "the Collective".
Or perhaps we'd become like Coral. That's a more pleasant way of viewing it. This tyrannical ruler would essentially be oppressing itself at that point.
Adding on:
This one god-like entity to rule us all is the goal, but tyrant (a cruel and oppressive ruler) or paragon (a being viewed as a model of excellence), who knows what this ruler will choose. Ray Kurzweil thinks paragon, Max Tegmark thinks tyrant.
>Freemasons, Bilderberg, israelitery
Who did it best?
I've come to admire the technocrats. What a monumental task this must have been in the beginning stages.
Hey anon, are you aware of the fact that they mean to, quite literally, kill you?
They can kill me but will never take my soul. My faith in God is stronger.
Don't underestimate technology, they will eventually find the way to destroy your soul if you misinterpret "turn the other cheek" eternally.
you better hope they can put your brain in a jar and plug it into horrors beyond human comprehension or do so after growing your clone in a lab from a strand of hair
you can't deny their ingenious machinations non the less
>I can't help but admire the psychopath that's looking to take everything I have, including my life
I mean, you should have a reasoned respect for the hurricane, but I wouldn't admire it.
I'm aware this could be the abyss looking back at me, but I think they're testing us on some Darwinian "survival of the fittest" type stuff. They still allow us to read and listen to what they all believe and think, so when they tell us to "maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature," I listen and prepare for a time when I may have to prove my spot on the boat or wherever the 500 million people are going. Maybe it's transhumanism-based, like the singularity.
I think that's part of it. But they don't want the ones remaining to be free. They apparently want to control like biological machines.
No ownership, no autonomy, no freedom, just your emotions and thoughts monitored and controlled by their AIs.
Make no mistake anon, these people are utter lunatics. They aren't idiots, but they are certainly crazy.
If they wanted the top 500m of humans to survive why would they flood white countries with low IQ savages?
They want slaves, not capable, free thinking individuals.
"A failing economy. High taxes. Romans became lazy and comfortable. Romans hired barbarian mercenaries to guard the borders."
The bottom percentage of whites are being sacrificed economically or genetically, for cheaper labor.
Adding on: An example of bottom-tier whites being sacrificed are people known as Chavs. Foreigners will replace them first.
I'm more likely to be killed by a crazed wacko with a gun than I am by a technocrat.
You can also see a mass kill off coming. They don't target individuals. It's usually a large wave of death, by accident or otherwise. 6,881,718 people have died so far from the coronavirus COVID-19 outbreak as of May 24, 2023. Then, to clean up their "mess", they release a vaccine. The estimated human cost of the COVID-19 vaccines is 26.6 million injuries, 1.36 million disabilities, and 300,000 excess deaths. Allegedly.
why are those scientists wearing space suits? You only need a cheap surgical mask to stop rona
Interesting question...
It's biosafety-related. That lab may have specific practices, safety equipment, and specially designed buildings to ensure that workers, the community, and the environment are protected from accidental exposure or unintentional release of infectious agents, toxins, and other biological hazards.
"Airborne transmissible diseases like COVID-19 are typically categorized as Biosafety Level 3 (BSL-3). BSL-3 laboratories are almost always purpose-constructed containment laboratories, outfitted with specialized equipment and HVAC systems designed to ensure no airborne particles can exit the contained space." - Consolidated Sterilizer Systems
The CDC must've placed COVID-19 next to Anthrax on the biosafety clearance level. Even if it's not as bad as anthrax, the workers in the lab don't make the calls. They have to put the suits on in order to enter the lab and do their job.
Adding on:
Or that image could've been another Bilderberg psyop to make COVID-19 look like a BSL-4. The Wall Street Journal is owned by Rupert Murdoch, who was a participant in the 1988 Bilderberg Meeting.
Link: https://publicintelligence.net/1988-bilderberg-meeting-participant-list/
>I'm more likely to be killed by a crazed wacko
Who do you think controls the crazed wacko
hello
They don't admire you
I haven't done anything worthy of their admiration.
Satan and the fallen angels do the work. Most the pawns don't even know what they are involved with other than being evil.
Like an apiarist (Satan) and a beehive (the pawns). Shout out to my Bible thumpers. Love ya'll.
I think the technocrats are trying to prevent another Ozymandias situation:
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal Wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away.”
The ideology is what's being built this time around instead of bricks and mortar. Like an ideological Tower of Babel.
they literally got born in already rich and succesful families retard
Technocrats and old money, to whom you'd be referring, don't mix well. Old money is interested in keeping things as they are or were, which is the opposite of what technocrats want. The only technocrats that I know who were also old money would be David Rockefeller and Evelyn de Rothschild, who both attended Bilderberg Group meetings. The rest of the technocrats are relatively new money in comparison. For example, Elon Musk, Bill Clinton, Al Gore and Anthony Fauci got rich later in life. They were born upper-middle-class at best. Musk's dad got rich in the 1980s when Elon was a teen.
Adding on:
I don't count Beatrix of the Netherlands who's on the chart because most royals just go to be seen. A technocracy goes against everything royals stand for.
the image is impossible to follow. schizo shit
>schizo shit
no shit
Smooth brain retard
israelites
>hurrrrr if its not a 6 second tiktok....its schizo!
We know zoomie, you can't read.
Alternatively, Id love to see your thoughts on just about any private detectives maltego graph. Tard.
this board worships money
and these are your gods
This web is much more than just money. It's showing the organized cooperation between corporations, think tanks, banks, the government, the media, and educational institutions toward a technocratic common goal.
To add on: A technocracy is a government run by experts, which I assume most of this board would be into if Elon or someone like that were part of it. A one-world government run by experts, basically. If you're a crypto guy, imagine Vitalik Buterin, Charles Hoskinson and Elon Musk running your country instead of who we have now. See? Not so bad.
the gods of the valleys
are not
The Gods of the Hills
Does this mean that the same gods that rule urban centers are not the gods of the countryside?
I hear ya.
In the End, God Wins, and We Win, When God Wins.
Elon "The Devil's Champion Musk" is not your friend.
I'm using Elon as an example to help make you guys more comfortable with the idea of technocratic rule over what we have now. If you don't like Elon, pick another technocrat. I'd happily be ruled by Linus Torvalds and the like because he's a genius who's actually down to earth.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Humans were never meant to have that level of power over others. They will inevitably be tyrants, not necessarily because they're bad people (though most that seek control over others are), but because the system demands it.
I always forget Libertarianism is the main ideology of this board. I'd love to see it in action on a large scale. I'm just mentally preparing for the most authoritarian governmental progression.
Libertarianism doesn't work if it doesn't contain mechanisms to prevent the concentrations of power.
Power works much like biological succession. You slash and burn a forest and you get the primary colonizers taking root here and there. They modify the environment in their own way and eventually give way to higher level succession, ending up with the domination of larger plants that block out the sun and use their phytochemical warfare to suppress smaller upstarts.
So something like egalitarian libertarianism, which stresses both individual freedom and social equality.
I dunno really. I think the key lies in the primacy of local power/sovereignty, where local communities can effectively reject anything that the state or federal government wants to push on them. Not sure how that would work in practice though.
Yea I know that centers of non-governmental power infect governments to force regulations to their advantage. That's obviously a huge reason why things are so shit right now.
How would you prevent the growth of centralized power in an environment where centralized power has an inherent advantage?
>How would you prevent the growth of centralized power in an environment where centralized power has an inherent advantage?
Not that anon but it is typically the introduction of regulation and taxes allow power to be centralized in the first place. I don't believe a business, nor a specific product or service could actually be so good and also impossible to replicate that it would stand a chance to maintain a large market share without state intervention.
>Libertarianism doesn't work if it doesn't contain mechanisms to prevent the concentrations of power.
Yeah, that's call laissez-faire capitalism
You aren't one of those dimwits who thinks that more government = less monopolies right ?
>Libertarianism doesn't work if it doesn't contain mechanisms to prevent the concentrations of power.
We already tried that, it only gave the government more power and made things worse.
We unironically need a free market.
Could you please explain to me the meaning of the word "meant" in the context of human evolution. Thank you.
You can take it in the sense that humans have innate desires to control and dominate their environment. These desires are kept in check by the fact that it's difficult to do so. If you give a person absolute, godlike powers, the checks dissolve and the person is free to engage in limitless domination and control. They also can't oversee what effects their powerful actions, actions that affect millions of people will really have on a granular level, and their psychological defense mechanisms will lead him to dismiss and demonize those who complain that his actions are causing them to suffer.
It's basically just the same sort of thing as taking people who evolved to crave sugar in sugar poor environments and putting them in the world's largest chocolate factory.
You evolve for a particular range of environments, when you're put in a drastically different environment, some of your physiological or physiological mechanisms can become pathological.
Great explanation. Now to propose a counter argument: existence is not static. Sugar has killed and will continue to kill all those who can't adapt to the new meta. It's just the way it is. Perhaps one day humans will evolve to be capable of wielding power. A lot of creatures will perish in the process, but that's just the way the system operates.
Yes but what evolutionary mechanism prevents the would be tyrant from being a tyrant? Unless every tyrant is killed to weed out the psychological mechanisms, making them unable to persist in the genes of the population, you'll continue to have tyrants.
Yes, but why is that a problem? Do you mourn the sugar victims?
Nobody actually has godlike powers so in the real world, there are always limits to domination and control.
What changes is technology. This time around, the powers of surveillance, data processing and weaponry and other mechanisms of control are many orders of magnitude beyond anything that even the tyrants of the last century had.
You should fear the sugar eaters because you are the sugar.
Fear is the mind killer, fren. You telling me I should fear the inevitable, how is that going to help? This is the way the world works. I choose to accept it.
More like, be wary of them and what they want. They seek to dominate and control you.
I don't think it's inevitable though by any stretch. We're seeing a massive bubble in the tyranny market and it's going to burst sooner or later. You're far better off living your life and improving your own local world than worrying about what narcissistic psychopaths in high places are doing.
>Sugar has killed and will continue to kill all those who can't adapt to the new meta
Que?
There's only one who is capable of wielding power and that is God.
Absolute power is the end result of consolidation of power. Technological innovation ensures one or few will one day control all, far further than they do now. I would prefer a benevolent tyrant over an insidious one. Free societies --in its true interpretation as opposed to a literal interpretation-- will be a thing of the past going forward, that is reality.
> Technological innovation ensures one or few will one day control all
I don't agree, though you MAY be right in the end. It's really a war between mechanisms that make centralized power more formidable vs decentralized power.
For example, the printing press decentralized knowledge (a conduit of power) and lead to the enlightenment among other things.
Or cannons destroyed the centralized power of stone fortifications. Or crossbows decentralized power by drastically reducing the barrier of entry to killing a knit (vs longbows, which took a lot more training). Then guns completely flipped the board (which is why they're SO obsessed with taking guns away).
Another example is the death of the battleship vs planes. Little entities of decentralized power overcame the big, 50,000 tones of centralized power.
Technology can swing this balance one way or the other. If you want to be free, you have to help develop technology that enables the decentralization of power.
Very well said. Even such things as Airbnb, where decentralised hosts competes strongly against large traditional hotel chains. Pareto law I suppose
They should do a new season of the office with Linus playing his own role.
Based. Just bought more McDonald's.
I'm lovin' it.
this is very outdated. it probably hasnt changed that much, but it has definitely changed, that image is like 15 years old and I've never seen an updated one
This looks like a boob and im going to go coom
Thanks op
>it's all a handful of people that meet together in one location from time to time
Retard.
>calling the killdozer retarded
Go back
Cope.
>Christians any time someone does something bad
I want to print this out in full size. You think the print shop would call the FBI on me?
It's sad that the majority of people still think we live in a free market or that capitalism is a good thing. This image alone is at the core capitalism not completely different from communism. I guess the biggest difference is at least with communism it's in your face capital it's like unless you're aware of this image and understand it people will continue to think McDonalds and burger king are owned by two different ceos that run only their company and are trying to compete for your attention when it's all one big fucking lie.
Huge difference between this and communism. You may not be able to get hand selected as CEO of a huge corporation, but you can still be a small time big timer and make it in business. You’re not destined to be garbage man #6043 for the rest of your life. At least there’s a sandbox game to play in this system. Communism is completely on rails.
Sorry I should have also stated I hate both systems capital and communism I see it as the same coin just different methods of taking power. I rather support local businesses.
True. I was surprised to read that small businesses generate 44% of U.S. economic activity (GDP). 33.2 million small businesses exist across the US, and only 2% of those small businesses have between 20 and 499 employees. So if you don't think about this big-picture stuff, you could do just fine in this country. I know a lot of small-town dwellers who don't have a clue about that image or even what LULZ is, but they're way more successful than me.
They do get bamboozled by psyops, though. This image shows us who creates and pushes these psyops that hurt, kill, or displace innocent people.
Anthony Fauci, a technocrat, ruled the US for a few years and it was hell. That's why I'd rather be ruled by a benevolent technocrat like Elon or Linus. Guys who are experts in tech instead of medicine.
Examples of insidious cooperation:
"McDonald's is partnering with the White House to promote coronavirus vaccine information on its coffee cups" - US News & World Report
This triggers copycat marketing campaigns by private companies: "Krispy Kreme will offer every American who has received at least one vaccination shot TWO free doughnuts any time every day Aug. 30 through Sept. 5." - CNBC
Sergey Nazarov made a deal with the devil
wrong corner bro, /misc/ is 3 blocks down from here
And
is one click away.
GO back.
Schizo hands made this picture
Its Maltego you retard. Its automated. Underage go back.
Or bipolar disorder, like Carrie Mathison from Homeland (a great show). The manic phase before the depression seems to give you enviable energy levels.
That's not how manic depression works. It's much much worse.
God just kill me now. I've been dead inside a long long time.
That's incredible software. I've always been amazed at the thought of someone creating this from scratch. I used to have that graph as a wallpaper years ago.
Thanks for the info, by the way. Much appreciated. I wish that video wasn't unlisted. Discernment is a luxury, I guess.
Eventually the elite will cannibalize themselves and there will remain one god-like tyrant and below him there will be a class of slaves
I think the fail-safe being built for that is something called the "technological singularity".
Unless a coup happens and the technology is destroyed forever, the technocrats in power will essentially be succeeded by their own creation.
I think tyrant is far more realistic, but he will think he's a paragon.
heres why it is inevitable
>having other people with power is a direct threat or hindrance to your power
>having everyone else be enslaved and powerless ensures you will never have to fear your position
theyll use AI and gene editing to create the perfect slaves, whilst cannibalizing themselves till just one remains.
I know it sounds crazy at first but if you study history its basically certain.
Wouldn't transhumanism trigger a mass human ego death, which is a complete loss of subjective self-identity, removing the "person" all together?
No longer "he", "I", "your", just "we", "our", "us", etc.
We'd become like the Borg, I think. The Borg are cybernetic organisms (cyborgs) linked in a hive mind called "the Collective".
Or perhaps we'd become like Coral. That's a more pleasant way of viewing it. This tyrannical ruler would essentially be oppressing itself at that point.
Adding on:
This one god-like entity to rule us all is the goal, but tyrant (a cruel and oppressive ruler) or paragon (a being viewed as a model of excellence), who knows what this ruler will choose. Ray Kurzweil thinks paragon, Max Tegmark thinks tyrant.
I'm israeli, sounds like a you problem.