>512GB SSDs are $23 now
>1TB SSDs are $35 now
>2TB SSDs are $70 now
>4TB SSDs are $142 now
>8TB SSDs are $345 now
>16TB SSDs are $1700 now
>30TB SSDs are $2600 now
>512GB SSDs are $23 now. >1TB SSDs are $35 now. >2TB SSDs are $70 now. >4TB SSDs are $142 now
Is this gif made for the propaganda war between South and North Korea?
I like how the cat smile when giving the beef tho
quick rundown??
it's a gif, who cares
nah
no, kill yourself though
why the enormous fucking jump in per-terabyte prices between 8 and 16?
8Tb - industry standard tech.
16Tb, 30Tb - bleeding edge of the tech.
My guess is they can reach 8 TB with cheap chips, form factors or controllers but anything above that requires some super expensive special sauce.
that's hard on the cramped PCB of m.2, but in a 2.5" sata drive there's more space than you need
hmmmmm
>using SSDs and not nvmes
poor stupid european
We've gotten to 8TB mostly through subdivision of cells to store multiple bits. Though there have been further advances like 3D NAND. SLC became MLC became TLC became QLC. And that's fine because consumers don't need to care about TBW. At this point we either need denser chips or more chips, and the latter requires better controllers, more space, and sufficient cooling. SCSI/U.2 SSDs have more chips. PLC is currently being developed with a view to have it in consumer tech in 2025, with the main issues being stability and lifetime.
Why dont they just give up on the 2.5in form factor and go to 3.5in
Larger SSDs are enterprise products, and SFF (2.5") storage servers are far more common than LFF (3.5") ones.
>more space, and sufficient cooling
see
we've been cucked by this m.2 form-factor bullshit
Because OP is an enormous homosexual seeking out attention.
Black square not fit so good on 2280
When 16Tb are $600 I'll finally replace the spinning rust on my server.
I think I paid $119 for 2TB Samsung 990 pro. Plus $6 for a heatsink which I'm not entirely sure is necessary or useful at all but probably doesn't hurt.
Intel 670p 2TB was $75 each at micro center a few months ago.
but when they boot up they don't go whrrrrrr click click click
> 4TB SSDs are $142 now
Sata? I need pair of 4TB NVMEs. Shit's expensive.
You can find low quality NVME for that price when it's on sale. Good quality stuff is still around $200 when on sale.
imagine using spinning disks for your boot driver. if you do this you're retarded and poor
Seems like a software problem. You'd have to have a pretty shit OS for this to make a significant impact.
>nvmes aren't faster than ssd which aren't faster than spinning disk
nope, couldn't be more wrong
>OS
OS has nothing to do with slow software or slow hardware, learn something
Neither of those are what I said at all. Good luck with your English courses.
>"Seems like a software problem."
>"I didn't say it was a software problem"
>"You'd have to have a pretty shit OS for this to make a significant impact."
>"I didn't say it was an OS problem"
lol
The > symbol already means quote. You use multiple for multiple people.
In regard to the post, you're still missing the point it seems. If you need the speed of an NVME for your boot process, something is wrong with the software.
Developers often try to excuse their bad practice by piggybacking off of hardware gains but that crutch doesn't make their software any less shit. Sorry if you got offended.
> If you need the speed of an NVME for your boot process, something is wrong with the software.
get a load of this idiot. MUH SPINNING DISK
Your post comes off as nothing more than some form of cope. I guess it's either attention bait or some kind of self justification. Makes me feel bad for you.
cope for what? that your disk is slow as shit?
notice you retards use that word but don't even know what it means? nvmes are way way faster than your spinning rust. just run crystaldiskmark and you'll see the numbers, it's not even close. are you fucking dumb? you sound like you've overdosed on copium big time, better take the rope antidote
We're talking about nvmes and software, I don't know why you keep bringing up mechanical drives, especially since it seems to frustrate you.
i have a mirrored pair of nvmes exclusively just for swap
shut your poor ass the fuck up
>using swap
POOR. i have 256GB ram, i will never ever use swap in my life. swap is for GAYS like YOU also mirror nvmes is pointless, you're a moron LOL
cope and fake and wronfg
cope about what? and what is fake and wrong?
cope about what?
I'm not fomo'ing into a SSD without a Wataten in the OP.
is it better to grab one 8tb ssd or 4 2tb ssd's with some raid configuration?
I'd go with 6x 2tb on raidz 2, a single parity drive is not enough imo.
draid is nice too.
Though my setup is that i have 2x 4tb in zfs mirror for bit flip error correction and i backup the important stuff often on top of having it synced across devices.
the raid will be a huge bottleneck
has anyone even tried making a zfs system out of thst many drives? honestly interested in this
It is not that bad unless you have a faulty drive.
It will even perform better for reading.
Oh also, you can use dozens of drives or even hundreds with zfs, do not think raid and zfs raid are anything alike.
I'm talking about the GBps speeds of nvme. can zfs keep up with that, like for regular zfs chores?
In my experience yes.
At some point you will be cpu and ram speed bottlenecked but it is not zfs's fault.
I know that, what I want to know is where the botteneck is. I can't find much examples of all nvme zfs builds out there
Does the average user need more than a 2TB SSD?
You can't fool me with your "average user" crap again, nobody who reads this thread is an "average user"
>nobody who reads this thread is an "average user"
Never said so
LULZ is ironically one of the most normalfag boards though.
>knows nothing about tech
>just makes shitty hello words and fizzbuzz in the FoTM language
>no job experience
>only "experience" is rebelling against windows and mac by installing the FoTM unusable linux distro that doesn't get anything done.
>just echos ecelebs opinions.
>other threads are either tech support or normalfags complaining that adblock has stopped working on youtube
LULZ is actually below average.
But a lot of us deal and/or sell stuff to average users
yes
No. I bought my dad a 1TB SSD a few years ago and he hasn't even used 200GB.
I honestly never reach even 150gb of usage if not counting games, which is still like less than 1tb for me rn
please list prices for non shit tier ssds only please
>tfw you fell for the 16 TiB of RAM meme
Lmao you only need 8TiB of ram retard
They’re saying the windows 30 premium sub will use only 4TiB at launch
>NO BOOT DEVICE FOUND SYSTEM HALTED are $23 now
>NO BOOT DEVICE FOUND SYSTEM HALTED are $35 now
>NO BOOT DEVICE FOUND SYSTEM HALTED are $70 now
>NO BOOT DEVICE FOUND SYSTEM HALTED are $142 now
>NO BOOT DEVICE FOUND SYSTEM HALTED are $345 now
>NO BOOT DEVICE FOUND SYSTEM HALTED are $1700 now
>NO BOOT DEVICE FOUND SYSTEM HALTED are $2600 now
Buy an ad, Scamsung shill.
you need to enable a disk in your bios to boot to, hope this helps, dummy
>2TB SSDs are $70 now
how long until reputable chink SSDs are $49.99 and below
yes due to abusive importing taxes reasons, this price is the absolute limit
Where's Emily?
Much better. Thank you, anon.
UOH
a creature of pure sexual energy
not low enough
I can get 2x8TB HDDs for $300
IIRC, anything above 8tb requires a controller to manage multiple SSDs which drastically increases how expensive they are
The OP is wrong, actually
~16TB SSDs are going for under $1000 new
Also the cost of higher capacity is really in density. With every generation of NAND there is often on offer a double density package.
If the densest single die NAND package is 8 terabit, you might find something like a 16 terabit package. The 16 terabit package costs well more than double what an 8 terabit package would cost because the die stacking operation has less than 100% yield.
A 16tb hard disk is $300
tldr: GFY
Less if you are shuckpilled
Which is the best SSD brand?
Team Group.
Crucial
Samsung
Intel and it's not even close.
SK Hynix
Sandisk
Micron
For consumers, Samsung and Crucial.
For enterprises, Kioxia and Intel.
Kingston offer the best tbw/$
yes
What do I do with the 60GB and 80GB SSD sitting under my bed.
torrent cache/temp drives, ZFS cache drives, raid0 scratch disk, old laptops
it bothers me that she only ever eats the most recently cooked steak despite having another on the plate
the other food is gonna get cold
it's just a cute gif anon, don't think much about it.
> t. was getting annoyed at it as well along with how she isn't eating the rice at all
the heat from the new steaks keep the rest of the plate warm
Waiting for 4tb to drop to around 80 USD and I'm going all in
Just 5 more years...
I'm willing to wait
Which is the best HDD brand?
They're all good.
512GB boot drive
2x14TB datacenter HDD's for stuff
simple as
>buy 30 1TB SSDs for $350
Nothing personal, 30TB SSD
the hardware to raid those will cost you $2000
spinning rust fags on suicide watch
I built a nas 2 years ago, I think it was about $600 for 40TB raw capacity, saturates 10GbE in reads and I have a nvme mirror for OS, services and a write hole for quickly dumping large amounts of data (zfs tiered storage). That time line is basically perfect, means I can get even more better disk space as soon as these drives are on their death bed.
That is the dream, all I have are 160gb drives lying around. Worthless except for long term cold storage of the most important things.
what were the specs?
nvme prices are rising here in Germany.
another wave of governmentally underreported price inflation is upon us.
That's weird, all the best sdd prices on Amazon come from Germany. Got my WD Green 2TB for $60.
I actually like how these new SSDs work, if you use 1/4 of it (480GB), it is essentially an SLC drive. It will quietly write to QLC in the background, so after a while you will have 1/4 of remaining space as SLC to use.
Previous gen SSDs have a fixed amount of SLC cache provisioned ~5-20GB which sucked balls.
This is so bogus. OP is too pussy to Tyrone storage.
Bbc
Imagine not Tyrone'ing in 2023. The eternal pussies of LULZ