LULZ / TV & Film

1 > 2 > 4 > 3 > 5 > 6

1 > 2 > 4 > 3 > 5 > 6

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >the lost world better than anything

    kys

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      not op but he's right, that's how bad that fucking serie is.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      At least 2 was made by an actual filmmaker

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        this. it's basically action porn, some of the scenes work narratively and some don't. the gymastic scene was obviously a scene that didn't.

        compare that to JP3 which has a plot for the first act, then barely any dialogue and much worse action cenes than JP2 for the rest of the movie.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the script was terrible but (a) the script to JP3 was worse, and (b) the Trevorrow trilogy is unwatchable

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This is the only bad scene in the entire film. Although Malcolm is admittedly a boring lead.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This. I felt he at least had a character arc in this movie, as opposed to Neil in JP3 who's like "oh no we're on the island" and then just runs and shouts for 90 minutes and then escapes.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the stuff with the t-rex on the mainland at the end was good. still a huge step down from the first movie, obviously, but i'd still have it comfortably in 2nd or 3rd place

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >points out one moment in one scene in a 2 hour film
      I bet you say TFA or ROTS is better than ROTJ because ewoks

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    1 >>>>>>>> 3 > 2 > 4>>>>>>> 6 > 5

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    3>gnomish Degenerate Garbage

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I watched the first 2 but then the premise became just too retarded. Like cloning dinos on a remote island is still somewhat believable and some of them breaking out and escaping into the world, okay. But once the cat is out of the bag messing with dinos in any capacity would become a serious crime so every military branch of every first world nation should have dozens of divisions developing all kinds of contingency plans to kill the lizards.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why it's not like dinosaurs could take back the planet. Big ass predators like T-rex need big prey and lots of it. Wtf are they going to eat? Humans? Pretty sure you could kill a t-rex with a 9mm though it wouldn't be easy. Maybe if they made prehistoric marine predators but even then I'm pretty sure a sperm whale would mog a mosasaurus. We used to have giant predators running around like dire wolves and cave bears they didn't last long after we came around.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    1>2>who fucking cares

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    embarrassing when homosexuals try to rank franchises that have only ONE good film, the first one
    jurassic park, matrix, mission impossible, rambo etc.
    >inb4 "b-but that one sequel is actually good!"
    no it's not

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >mission impossible

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        true tho. only the de palma one was really good. the woo sequel was already almost fantasy(not his fault, just the wrong director for a spy thriller) and the series got more and outrageous with every sequel.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      At the heart of your post I can't really argue that Jurassic Park is the only film worth a rewatch from anyone over the age of 15, but then you have to go and embarrass yourself by claiming there's only one good Rambo movie and one good Mission Impossible movie, beliefs that are based solely in your own retardation.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >implying Brad Bird’s Ghost Protocol isn’t as good as 1
      >implying Rambo 4 isn’t a solid 7/10

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You're right about the others but Mission Impossible has no less than three great movies

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      jurassic park was the only bad franchise you listed pleb. should've said alien, star wars, star trek etc.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Honestly I think quality wise they just go in release order, and it has a lot to do with the fact that they ran out of source material.

    The first movie was able to base itself off of the novel almost faithfully, but made a few crucial changes which came back to bite them later on.

    The 2nd movie was a complete rush job. Crichton had zero plans to write a sequel and was basically obliged to because of the success of the movie. However the problem now was that he had to combine his novel canon and the film canon.
    He had to retcon Malcom's death in the 2nd novel because he survived in the film, and I believe he only created Isla Sorna because in his novel, Nublar ended with the army firebombing the whole island to shit.

    3 trying to continue the money train but was received so poorly they had to kill the series for a while

    And 4 to 6 were purely just cash-grabs at a point where studios realized you can nostalgia bait the fuck out of people and still make millions (see Star Wars)

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    4>1>3>6>5>2

    Don't @ me. Wrap this thread up

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      @homosexual you're gay

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    True

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    As a kid I thought TLW was much more boring and contrived than the original. Based Roland was the only good character. JP3 was equally stupid, but it didn't feel like it was trying to be anything more than just a typical action movie. JW was better than 3, but FK just felt like they ran out of ideas and started flinging shit at the wall. Why would they not save the island getting destroyed for the last movie? I get that they had to justify the dinos getting on the mainland somehow, but they already did that in TLW. They should have saved the volcano erupting for the last movie so the dinos could all go extinct again and there'd be some closure. We all know Universal just wants to leave the last movie open-ended so they can make another sequel 10 years from now.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I like Chris Pratt, but his character ruined this franchise. He's too much of an action hero. The first movie was good because Sam Neill wasn't a young buff guy. He was a smart grumpy scientist who looked like he could be your dad. Richard Attenborough was a kindly grandfather type of character like Obi-Wan Kenobi who kids always love. The dinos aren't exactly threatening anymore if the main protagonist is a more competent version of a Marvel hero played by the same actor.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Wow. An actual list I agree with. Glad to see 3 isn't at the bottom of the list anymore. Had to skip through Fallen Kingdom to keep myself from falling asleep and I just finished reading the synopsis for Dominion and I'm just in awe they could fuck up this badly.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Release order seems about right for me
    There is no world where 4 is better than 3.

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    2 is hot garbage.

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    none of the movies after the first one are any good so it's basically jurassic park and then everything else, ranking the contents of a sack of shit doesn't matter

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      yeah nah, the quality between Lost World and any of the Jurassic Worlds is night and day. You are right that the first one is the only truly good one, but 2 is absolutely better than 4 and 5 and there's really no comparison

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    1>2>3>4>5>6

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    1>2>5>3>4>>>>>>>6

Your email address will not be published.